Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People ex rel. Moloney
| Decision Date | 13 June 1895 |
| Citation | Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People ex rel. Moloney, 156 Ill. 448, 41 N.E. 188 (Ill. 1895) |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
| Parties | DISTILLING & CATTLE FEEDING CO. v. PEOPLE ex rel. MOLONEY, Attorney General. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Cook county; John Gibbons, Judge.
Quo warranto by the people of the state of Illinois, on the relation of M. T. Moloney, attorney general, against the Distilling & Cattle Feeding Company.There was judgment of ouster.Defendant appeals.Affirmed.Stevens & Horton and Runnells & Burry, for appellant.
M. T. Moloney, Atty. Gen. (Samuel Richolson, T. J. Scofield, and M. L. Newell, of counsel), for appellee.
This was a proceeding by quo warranto, brought in the name of the people of the state of Illinois, by the attorney general, against the distilling & Cattle Feeding Company.The defendant appeared and filed a number of pleas, to all of which demurrers were sustained; and, the defendant electing to abide by its pleas, judgment was rendered against it, ousting it from its franchises, and for costs.From that judgment, the defendant now appeals to this court.
The information alleges that on May 10, 1887, there were existing and doing business in various parts of this state five different corporations organized under our laws, also one corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, and one corporation organized under the laws of the state of Ohio, and a copartnership and an individual also doing business in that state, all of which were then engaged in operating distilleries, in the purchase of grain, and in the manufacture and sale of alcohol and other distillery products, and that for the purpose of forming and creating a trust, and with the design of controlling and regulating the output, manufacture, and sale of distillery products, and of establishing a monopoly in the manufacture and sale of the same, the owners of the capital stock of those corporations, together with the firm and individual above mentioned, entered into and executed a trust agreement as follows:
‘Whereas, it is designed to form a trust to be known as the ‘Distillers' and Cattle Feeders' Trust,’ for the purpose of securing intelligent co-operation in the business of distilling spirits from grain or other material, malting, and the feeding of live stock, and the sale of the products thereof in home and foreign markets, and to do all other business incidental to those enumerated: Therefore, it is mutually agreed by all who may sign this agreement,or become at any time the holders of the certificates of trust herein provided for, as follows:
‘First.The trust herein created shall be vested in nine trustees.
‘Second.William H. Hobart, George K. Duckworth, Lewis H. Green, Peter J. Hennessy, Alfred Davis, Joseph B. Greenhut, Warren H. Corning, Adolph Woolner, and John H. Francis are hereby appointed trustees, to hold their office until the 1st day of May, A. D. 1888, or until their successors are elected and qualified.
‘Third.The trustees shall prepare certificates which shall show the interest of each beneficiary in said trust, and deliver them to the persons entitled thereto.The certificates shall be divided into shares of the par value of $100.00 each, and shall be known as the ‘Distillers' and Cattle Feeders' Trust Certificates.’The trustees shall have full power to agree upon and direct the form and contents of said certificates, and the mode in which they shall be executed, attested, and transferred.The certificates shall contain an express stipulation that the holders thereof shall be bound by the terms of this agreement, and by the by-laws herein provided for.
Distilling Company; Peoria Distilling Company; Birmingham Distilling Company, by Chicago Distilling Company; Missouri Distilling Company, by Mound City Distilling Company,-have transferred the same to said trustees.Thereafter the said trustees and their successors shall have power to purchase other stocks of the same companies, or of companies organized for conducting the same business, or any of the businesses hereinbefore specified, and may issue therefor certificates of trust equal at par value to the cash value of the stocks so purchased, or shall have power to lease the premises of such companies, paying therefor such rental as they may deem proper, whenever, in their judgment, it is for the best interests of the trust to lease rather than purchase.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Northern Securities Company v. United States
...by courts of high standing. Ford v. Chicago Milk Shippers' Asso. 155 Ill. 166, 27 L. R. A. 298, 39 N. E. 651; Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People, 156 Ill. 448, 41 L. ed. [Argument of Counsel from pages 310-312 intentionally omitted] Page 312 Fictions of law, invented to promote justi......
-
State v. Standard Oil Co.
...like it. State v. Standard Oil Co., 49 Ohio St. 137, 30 N. E. 279, 15 L. R. A. 145, 34 Am. St. Rep. 541; Distilling, etc., Co. v. People, 156 Ill. 448, 41 N. E. 188, 47 Am. St. Rep. 200; Bishop v. A. Preserving Co., 157 Ill., loc. cit. 311, 41 N. E. 765, 48 Am. St. Rep. 317; People v. N. R.......
-
United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.
... ... the case of the Howard-Harrison Iron Co. people, on ... Jacksonville, Fla., the truth of the ... delivery of cattle in any one town. It would only be required ... 406; State v ... Nebraska Distilling Co., 29 Neb. 700, 46 N.W. 155; ... State v ... 721; ... Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People, 156 Ill ... 448, 41 N.E. 188; ... ...
-
Commonwealth v. Dyer
...as is here charged ‘are against the policy of the law, and are therefore illegal and void.’ Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People, 156 Ill. 448, 490, 41 N. E. 188, 202 (47 Am. St. Rep. 200);Connors v. Connolly, 86 Conn. 641, 652, 86 Atl. 600,45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 564;State v. Standard Oil......
-
Introduction
...illegal per se, relying on prior state case law to the same effect). 142. See, e.g ., Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People, 41 N.E. 188 (Ill. 1895); Queen Ins. Co. v. State, 24 S.W. 397 (Tex. 1893); State Att’y Gen. v. Standard Oil Co., 30 N.E. 279 (Ohio 1892). 143. See, e.g ., Antibio......
-
Introduction
...illegal per se, relying on prior state case law to the same effect). 146. See, e.g ., Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People, 41 N.E. 188 (Ill. 1895); Queen Ins. Co. v. State, 24 S.W. 397 (Tex. 1893); State Att’y Gen. v. Standard Oil Co., 30 N.E. 279 (Ohio 1892). 147. See, e.g ., Antibio......
-
The Consumer-welfare Standard Should Cease to Be the North Star of Antitrust
...People v. Chicago Gas Trust Company, 130 Ill. 268, 22 N.E. 798, 801-803 (1889) (same); Distilling & Cattle Feeding Co. v. People, 156 Ill. 448, 41 N.E. 188, 202 (1895); see, e.g., Arnot v. Coal Co., 68 N.Y. 558, 565 (1877) (decreeing invalid a contract between two coal companies by which th......