District of Columbia v. Clephane
Decision Date | 21 January 1884 |
Citation | 28 L.Ed. 122,110 U.S. 212,3 S.Ct. 568 |
Parties | DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CLEPHANE |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
A. G. Riddle, for plaintiff in error.
Wm. F. Mattingly, C. C. Cole, and Wm. A. Cook, for defendant in error.
The defendant in error made a contract in writing with the board of public works of the District of Columbia in 1872 for the paving of parts of certain streets in the city of Washington with the 'Miller wood pavement.' In that contract there was the following clause, on which this action is founded, on account of its alleged violation by the defendant:
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant did not in good, sufficient, and workmanlike manner, nor in accordance with the specifications of the contract, execute the work therein mentioned, and that within three years from its completion a large part o it became defective from imperfect and improper material and construction. It is further alleged that defendant was duly notified of this, and required to repair it, which he failed to do, whereupon plaintiff did so, at an expense of $40,517, for which judgment is asked against defendant. The answer is a substantial denial of these allegations, with some special matter in defense not material to be noticed here. On the trial before a jury, after all the plaintiff's evidence was in, the defendant demurred to it as insufficient, and the court directed the jury to find a verdict for the defendant. It appears from the bill of exceptions, which contained all the evidence offered, that within the three years after the completion of the work the pavement became so badly broken up and so imperfect as to require extensive repairs, and demand was made on defendant to repair it; that on his failure to do so the officers of the district who had charge of the matter determined to remove the wooden pavement on several squares of the streets and replace it with another kind...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Cleveland v. Walsh Const. Co.
... ... subdivided into those where the proceedings are wholly before ... the district judge and those which are disposed of in part ... before a referee--by whatever name called. As ... Filbert v. Philadelphia, ... 181 Pa. 530, 547, 37 A. 545; District of Columbia v ... Clephane, 110 U.S. 212, 3 Sup.Ct. 568, 28 L.Ed. 122 ... Apparently, the master's ... ...
-
Walsh Const. Co. v. City of Cleveland
... 271 F. 701 WALSH CONST. CO. v. CITY OF CLEVELAND et al. No. 9406. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 12, 1920 ... [271 F. 702] ... [Copyrighted ... Filbert v. Philadelphia, 181 Pa. 530, 547, 37 A ... 545; District of Columbia v. Clephane, 110 U.S. 212, ... 3 Sup.Ct. 568, 28 L.Ed. 122. Apparently the master's ... ...
-
Western Cabinet & Fixture Manufacturing Co. v. Davis
...Dam. (3 ed.) 1950-2; 67 N.J.L. 153; 3 M. & W. 390; 42 N.H. 165; 34 N.Y. 118; 4 Johns. 421; 68 L. R. A. 441; 6 Id. 392; Leake on Cont. 404; 110 U.S. 212; 178 F. 806; 79 Id. 43; 141 U.S. 137 F. 332; 80 Ill. 477; 98 Ark. 482; 94 Id. 282; 64 N.Y. 411. 4. The court erred in its charge as to the ......
-
Busch & Latta Painting Co. v. Woermann Construction Co.
... ... not entitled to indemnity. Washington Gas Co. v. District ... of Columbia, 161 U.S. 316, 40 Law Ed. 712. (2) The court ... erred in refusing to give the ... 657; ... Chanter v. Hopkins, Mess. & W. 390; District of ... Columbia v. Clephane, 110 U.S. 212; Kellogg Bridge ... Co. v. Hamilton, 110 U.S. 108; Pullman Car Co. v ... Met ... ...
-
The Construction Industry in the U.S. Supreme Court: Part 1, Contract Law
...21. Id. at 203. 22. Id. at 203–04. 23. Id. at 204–05. 24. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. Hamilton, 110 U.S. 108, 119 (1884). 25. D.C. v. Clephane, 110 U.S. 212 (1884). 26. See generally RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 347 (AM. LAW INST. 1981); 6 PHILIP L. BRUNER & PATRICK J. O’CONNOR JR., BRUNER......