Ditch v. Edwards
| Decision Date | 31 December 1834 |
| Citation | Ditch v. Edwards, 1 Scam. 127, 2 Ill. 127, 1834 WL 2583, 26 Am.Dec. 414 (Ill. 1834) |
| Parties | DAVID DITCH, plaintiff in error,v.ELVIRA L. EDWARDS, executrix of Ninian Edwards, deceased, defendant in error. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
J. B. THOMAS and D. PRICKET, for the plaintiff in error.N. W. EDWARDS, for the defendant in error.
This is a writ of error to the Monroe Circuit Court. The error relied on is that the summons is returned by a person who signs his name as deputy sheriff, without using the name of the sheriff. At the return term a judgment was rendered by default. This was clearly erroneous according to the decision in the case of Ryan v. Eads (Breese, 168). The defendant's counsel on the argument conceded that the judgment must be reversed, but requested that the cause might be remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings. This Court has power to remand causes for further proceedings, where there remains anything in the Court below that is legal. In this case, so far as the defendant below is concerned (he not having appeared, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Delfelder v. Teton Land & Investment Co.
...Eastman v. Curtis, 4 Vt. 616. There are, however, some early cases which sustain counsel's contention. These may be found in note to 26 Am. Dec. 414, and 9 Am. Engl. Ency. of Law (2d) 381. Some of them were decided under a statute which specifically provided that a deputy should execute doc......
-
State v. Laflame
...376, 31 N.W. 645; Summerville v. Sorrenson, 23 N.D. 460, 42 L.R.A. (N.S.) 877, 136 N.W. 938; Ditch v. Edwards, 26 Am. Dec. 414 and note, 2 Ill. 127. public officer is one who, by implication or express authority, has the right to exercise some portion of the sovereign power in making, execu......
-
Summerville v. Sorrenson
...by the authority of his principal, is a nullity. Wilson v. Russell, 4 Dak. 376, 31 N.W. 649; Ditch v. Edwards, 26 Am. Dec. 414, and note (2 Ill. 127) Gibbens v. Pickett, 19 L.R.A. 177, and note (31 147, 12 So. 17); Joyce v. Joyce, 5 Cal. 449. BURKE, J. Mr. Justice Goss, took no part in the ......
-
City of Chicago v. Cook Cnty.
...principal bailiff Albert J. Horan but in the name of the deputy, citing Ryan v. Eads, Breeze, 217, 1 Ill. 217, and Ditch v. Edwards, 1 Scam. 127,2 Ill. 127, 26 Am.Dec. 414. County organizations are created in this State with a view to aid in carrying out the policy of the State at large for......