Divito v. Divito, 2008-01421

Decision Date18 November 2008
Docket Number2008-01421
Citation56 A.D.3d 601,867 N.Y.S.2d 334,2008 NY Slip Op 09022
PartiesROSANNE DIVITO, Respondent, v. NICHOLAS DIVITO, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that continued enforcement of his maintenance obligation pursuant to a stipulation of settlement incorporated but not merged in the judgment of divorce would create an extreme hardship (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Mahato v Mahato, 16 AD3d 386 [2005]; cf. Lewis v Lewis, 43 AD3d 462, 463 [2007]). His remaining contentions are either without merit (see Costantino v Costantino, 225 AD2d 651 [1996]) or not properly before this Court (see Sloboda v Sloboda, 24 AD3d 533 [2005]).

RIVERA, J.P., LIFSON, ENG and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Capozzoli v. Capozzoli
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 1, 2011
    ...of his maintenance obligation would create an extreme hardship ( see Klein v. Klein, 74 A.D.3d 753, 901 N.Y.S.2d 545; DiVito v. DiVito, 56 A.D.3d 601, 602, 867 N.Y.S.2d 334; Mahato v. Mahato, 16 A.D.3d 386, 790 N.Y.S.2d 409; Vinnik v. Vinnik, 295 A.D.2d 339, 742 N.Y.S.2d 673). In addition, ......
  • Schwaber v. Schwaber
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • January 31, 2012
    ...( see Capozzoli v. Capozzoli, 81 A.D.3d 584, 585, 916 N.Y.S.2d 792; Klein v. Klein, 74 A.D.3d 753, 901 N.Y.S.2d 545; DiVito v. DiVito, 56 A.D.3d 601, 602, 867 N.Y.S.2d 334; Mahato v. Mahato, 16 A.D.3d 386, 790 N.Y.S.2d 409).RIVERA, J.P., ENG, LOTT and SGROI, JJ.,...
  • Klein v. Klein
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 1, 2010
    ...of his maintenance obligation would create an extreme hardship ( see Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][9][b]; DiVito v. DiVito, 56 A.D.3d 601, 602, 867 N.Y.S.2d 334; Mahato v. Mahato, 16 A.D.3d 386, 790 N.Y.S.2d 409). In addition, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, that bra......
  • Diaz v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • November 18, 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT