Dobard v. State

Decision Date14 August 1984
Docket Number2 Div. 434
Citation455 So.2d 281
PartiesPercy Leo DOBARD v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Ralph I. Knowles of Drake, Knowles & Pierce, Tuscaloosa and Barry E. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Ed Carnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

TAYLOR, Judge.

Percy Leo Dobard, while fleeing from a robbery he committed on June 21, 1980, murdered Livingston police officer Wayne Suddeth in cold blood. Dobard was convicted of this crime and sentenced to death under Code of Alabama 1975, § 13A-5-31(a)(5), prohibiting and providing penalties for the murder of a police officer while on duty. In June 1982, this court affirmed his conviction and sentence in Dobard v. State, 435 So.2d 1338. In July of 1983 the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed in Ex Parte Dobard, 435 So.2d 1351 (Ala.1983). On January 9, 1984, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Dobard v. Alabama, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 745, 79 L.Ed.2d 203. On February 6, 1984, the Alabama Supreme Court set Dobard's execution as March 9, 1984, Ex parte Dobard, Ms. 81-999 (unpublished order). Dobard moved for a stay of execution or a rescheduling, claiming that he did not know about the scheduled date as soon as he would like to have known. The Supreme Court of Alabama then granted Dobard's motion and rescheduled his execution for April 6, 1984 (unpublished order). On March 8, Dobard petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus or in the alternative a writ of error coram nobis to the Circuit Court of Marengo County. An accompanying motion sought a further stay of execution. The state moved to dismiss this petition and the circuit court on March 21, 1984, entered an order dismissing the petition. The circuit court order stated that the petition was dismissed without an evidentiary hearing because the first eight claims "were or could have been raised at trial or on appeal," and the ninth claim was "without merit and [was] not adequate on its face."

Dobard then filed notice of appeal and another motion for a stay of execution. The circuit court denied the motion for stay of execution. Dobard then filed a petition in the Court of Criminal Appeals for a stay of execution. The Court of Criminal Appeals transferred that motion to the Alabama Supreme Court and it was orally argued there on March 28, 1984. On that same date the Alabama Supreme Court denied the requested stay. In its accompanying order, the Alabama Supreme Court stated:

"The petitioner having filed his motion for stay of execution pending the appeal of the denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis to the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, and the same having been briefed, orally argued, submitted and duly examined and understood by the Court, and the Court having considered the original record on appeal, it is the opinion of the Court that the petitioner has stated no ground for relief which he did not raise on his original appeal, or which he could not have raised on his original appeal. Consequently, it is the opinion of the Court that the trial court did not err in denying the petition without holding a hearing." Ex parte Dobard, 450 So.2d 479. (unpublished order)

The following day, Dobard filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the federal court. The United States...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Magwood v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 4 Junio 1986
    ...412 So.2d 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), and coram nobis review of issues that could have been raised on direct appeal, Dobard v. State, 455 So.2d 281 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), Magwood v. State, 449 So.2d 1267 (Ala.Crim.App.), late appeal denied, 453 So.2d 1349 Since Magwood could have asserted the d......
  • Coulter v. State, 8 Div. 408
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 10 Junio 1986
    ...(Ala.1982); Summers v. State, 366 So.2d 336, 340 (Ala.Crim.App.1978), cert. denied, 366 So.2d 346 (Ala.1979); see, Dobard v. State, 455 So.2d 281, 283 (Ala.Crim.App.1984). CLAIM TWO: The Attorney's Fees and Expense Reimbursement Inadequacy 2. This claim is barred from coram nobis review bec......
  • Cochran v. State, 6 Div. 726
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 17 Marzo 1989
    ...412 So.2d 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), and coram nobis review of issues that could have been raised on direct appeal, Dobard v. State, 455 So.2d 281 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), Magwood v. State, 449 So.2d 1267 (Ala.Crim.App.), late appeal denied, 453 So.2d 1349 (Ala.1984)." Magwood v. Smith, 791 F.2d......
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 14 Octubre 1986
    ...Post-Conviction Remedies in Alabama Capital Cases, p. 12 (Montgomery, Ala.: The Southern Poverty Law Center, n.d.); Dobard v. State, 455 So.2d 281, 283 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Magwood v. State, 449 So.2d 1267, 1268 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). Jackson contends that the rule of Keller v. State, 380 So.2d 9......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT