Dobbins v. Dobbins
| Decision Date | 06 May 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 29775,29775 |
| Citation | 234 Ga. 347,216 S.E.2d 102 |
| Parties | Lois Marie DOBBINS v. James Walter DOBBINS. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Nicholas F. Maniscalco, Atlanta, for appellant.
Claude E. Hambrick, Atlanta, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Appellant-defendant wife appeals from the denial of a motion for a new trial in which a total divorce and custody of two minor children had been granted by the Fulton Superior Court to appellee-plaintiff husband on the grounds of habitual intoxication of the wife. The case was tried without a jury. Both the plaintiff husband and the two children testified as to the wife's habitual intoxication, which she did not deny. The minor daughter (15) requested that her father have legal custody. The defendant wife appeared on her own behalf without an attorney and stated in open court that she did not desire to obtain one in response to the trial judge's offer to continue the case. She contends in her brief in this Court that she attempted to secure counsel, but was unable to retain one. The court awarded defendant $100.00 per month alimony.
1. Under the Georgia Constitution, a person has the right to prosecute or defend his or her own cause in any court of this state, in person, by attorney or both. Code Ann. § 2-104, Const. art. I, § I, par. 4. This provision was 'primarily intended to guarantee the right of self-representation in the courts of this state . . .' Bloomfield v. Liggett and Myers, Inc., 230 Ga. 484, 485, 198 S.E.2d 144, 145. In reviewing the stipulation of facts and record, we find that the appellant was given a meaningful hearing and due process of law. See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287.
2. Appellant's enumeration of error as to the alleged inadequacy of the alimony is without merit. See Phillips v. Phillips, 231 Ga. 596, 203 S.E.2d 189.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Holt v. State, A92A0596
...trial court did not err in allowing appellate counsel to withdraw and in permitting appellant to represent himself. See Dobbins v. Dobbins, 234 Ga. 347, 216 S.E.2d 102; Coursey v. State, 196 Ga.App. 135, 137(5), 395 S.E.2d 3. The enumerations of error framed by appellant are that the trial ......
-
Blair v. Maynard
...(2nd Cir.1976); Sangster v. Sangster, 366 So.2d 1136 (Ala.Civ.App.1979); People v. Dunlap, 623 P.2d 408 (Colo.1981); Dobbins v. Dobbins, 234 Ga. 347, 216 S.E.2d 102 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019, 96 S.Ct. 455, 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); Custom Builders, Inc. v. Clemons, 52 Ill.App.3d 399,......
-
In re Lawsuits of Carter
...S.E.2d 813 (1994). 3. Ga. Const., Art. I, Sec. I, Par. I. 4. See OCGA § 5-6-41(f); Leatherwood v. State, supra. 5. Dobbins v. Dobbins, 234 Ga. 347(1), 216 S.E.2d 102 (1975). 6. State of Ga. v. Moseley, 263 Ga. 680, 682(3), 436 S.E.2d 632 (1993); Nelms v. Georgian Manor Condo. Assn., 253 Ga.......
-
Barber v. Barber
...in the courts of this State. ..." Bloomfield v. Liggett & Myers, Inc., 230 Ga. 484, 198 S.E.2d 144 (1973). See also, Dobbins v. Dobbins, 234 Ga. 347, 216 S.E.2d 102 (1975). ...
-
Artificial People: Why Corporations Cannot Appear in Court Without a Lawyer
...Cir. 1976); Sangster v. Sangster, 366 So. 2d 1136 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979); People v. Dunlap, 623 P.2d 408 (Colo. 1981); Dobbins v. Dobbins, 234 Ga. 347, 216 S.E.2d 102 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1019, 96 S. Ct. 455, 46 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1975); Custom Builders Inc. v. Clemons, 52 Ill. App. 3d......
-
Artificial People: Why Corporations Cannot Appear in Court Without a Lawyer
...Cir. 1976); Sangster v. Sangster, 366 So.2d 1136 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979); People v. Dunlap, 623 P.2d 408 (Colo. 1981); Dobbins v. Dobbins, 234 Ga. 347, 216 S.E.2d 102 (1975), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 1019, 96 S.Ct. 455, 46 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1975); Custom Builders Inc. v. demons, 52 111. App. 3d 399,......