Dobbins v. State

Decision Date29 September 1966
Docket NumberNo. 42322,No. 2,42322,2
CitationDobbins v. State, 114 Ga.App. 403, 151 S.E.2d 549 (Ga. App. 1966)
PartiesJack DOBBINS v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Atkins & Atkins, Dorothy D. Atkins, Atlanta, for appellant.

Lawrence B. Custer, Sol. Gen., D. R. McDonald, Marietta, for appellee. Syllabus Opinion by the Court

DEEN, Judge.

By Code § 15-302 the State of Georgia ceded jurisdiction to lands acquired by the United States 'for all purposes except service upon such lands of all civil and criminal process of the courts of this State * * *. The State retains its civil and criminal jurisdiction over persons and citizens in said ceded territory * * * except as to any ceded territory owned by the United States and used by the Department of Defense * * *.' However, Congress, in providing for the acquisition of lands in the various States, stipulated by statute (40 U.S.C. § 255 and 50 U.S.C. § 178) as follows: 'Unless and until the United States has accepted jurisdiction over lands hereafter to be acquired as aforesaid, it shall be conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been accepted,' and that the manner of indicating acceptance of such jurisdiction on behalf of the United States shall be by filing a notice with the Governor of the State in which the land is situated.

No such acceptance of exclusive criminal jurisdiction over the land known as Dobbins Air Force Base in Cobb County has been made by the United States. Following the well considered opinion in People v. Sullivan, 151 Colo. 434, 378 P.2d 633, which involves the identical point, we hold that, construing these two statutes in pari materia, the State statute amounts to an offer to cede criminal jurisdiction to the United States, which, to become effective, must be accepted in the proper manner by the latter entity, and that the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Devega v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 1, 2010
    ...not accepted "exclusive criminal jurisdiction over the land known as Dobbins Air Force Base in Cobb County. . . ." Dobbins v. State, 114 Ga. App. 403, 151 S.E.2d 549 (1966). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in concluding that the arrest on the base was lawful. Since the trial court'......
  • State v. Dykes
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • March 1, 1977
    ...of showing federal agency acceptance on the defendant who contends that the state court is without jurisdiction. See Dobbins v. State, 114 Ga.App. 403, 151 S.E.2d 549 (1966). Cf. U.S. v. Pate, 393 F.2d 44 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 890, 89 S.Ct. 209, 21 L.Ed.2d 168 (1968); Kans......
  • State v. Parker
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 2, 1987
    ...to prove the nonoccurrence of events which might deprive it of jurisdiction. State v. Rodriguez, supra; see also, Dobbins v. State, 114 Ga.App. 403, 151 S.E.2d 549 (1966). Appellant's remaining exceptions are without merit and are disposed of pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23. State v. Gool......
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 1980
    ...presumption of state court jurisdiction. 40 U.S.C. § 255; People v. Sullivan, 151 Colo. 434, 378 P.2d 633 (1963); Dobbins v. State, 114 Ga.App. 403, 151 S.E.2d 549 (1966); Kansas City v. Garner, 430 S.W.2d 630 (Kan.App.1968); State v. Dykes, 114 Ariz. 592, 562 P.2d 1090 (App.1977); United S......
  • Get Started for Free