Doble v. Brown

• Decision Date: 20 April 1898
• Docket Number: 1,978
• Citation: 50 N.E. 38,20 Ind.App. 12
• Parties: DOBLE v. BROWN ET AL
• Court: Indiana Appellate Court

50 N.E. 38

20 Ind.App. 12

DOBLE v. BROWN ET AL

No. 1,978

Court of Appeals of Indiana

April 20, 1898

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Davis & Turk, John L. Patterson and McNutt & McNutt, for appellant.

Lamb & Beasley, for appellees.

OPINION

HENLEY, J.

Appellant filed his complaint and affidavit in attachment against appellees in the lower court. The Vigo Agricultural Society of Vigo county was made a garnishee defendant only. Appellee Samuel A. Brown, answered the complaint and affidavit in attachment by a plea in abatement. A demurrer to this answer was overruled. Appellant refused to plead further, and upon motion of appellee Brown judgment was rendered against appellant. This judgment was rendered on the 15th day of March, 1895. Appellant prayed an appeal to this court. The record was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on the 20th day of December, 1895. After the judgment was rendered and before the appeal was taken the appellee Samuel A. Brown died. The appeal was prosecuted against the said Samuel A. Brown without regard to the fact that there was no such person in existence at the time the appeal was taken. On the 28th day of January, 1896, appellant filed a motion in this court entitled Budd Doble v. Samuel A. Brown, in which the court was asked to substitute for Samuel A. Brown, one of the appellees herein, the name of William A. Brown, executor of the will of Samuel A. Brown. Accompanying the motion and filed with it were the proofs of the death of said Samuel A. Brown. This motion was granted by the court. No further action was taken by appellant until the 25th day of October, 1897, when leave was asked by appellant to file an amended assignment of errors. On December 3, 1896, appellees moved to dismiss the appeal for the following, amongst other reasons: (1) Because there is not now, and was not at the time the assignment of errors was filed in this court, any such person living as Samuel A. Brown, who is named as appellee in the assignment of errors herein, as shown by the proof on file. (2) Because the assignment of errors is defective in this, to wit: That Samuel A. Brown is named as appellee in the assignment of errors, whereas said Samuel A. Brown was dead before the transcript and assignment of errors were filed in this court, as is shown by the proof on file. (3) Because the appeal was taken in the name of Budd Doble as appellant against Samuel A. Brown and Vigo Agricultural Society, appellees, and notice of appeal was served on Lamb & Beasley, attorneys of record for Samuel A. Brown, long after the death of said Brown, as is shown by the proof on file in this court. (4) Because Samuel A. Brown, named and designated in the assignment of errors as an appellee, died after judgment in the court below and before this appeal was taken and before the transcript was filed in this court, and notice of appeal was served upon the attorneys of record in the court below for said Brown, instead of being served upon William A. Brown, executor of the will of Samuel A. Brown, deceased.

The facts stated in each of the four specifications of the motion to dismiss are borne out and established by the record. No valid appeal was ever taken in the cause, the attempted appeal is a fiction and a nullity. It is provided by section 648, Burns' R. S. 1894, that "In case of the death of any or all the parties to a judgment before an appeal is taken, an appeal may be taken by, and notice of an appeal served upon, the persons in whose favor and against whom the action might have been revived if death had occurred before judgment. " This is the section of the statute under which the parties to this action should have proceeded. It has been held under this section by the appellate courts of this State, that they have no jurisdiction of an appeal prosecuted by or against parties who had died after the rendition of the judgment from which the appeal was taken and before the filing of the appeal in the appellate court. Taylor v. Elliott, 52 Ind. 588; Taylor v. Elliott, 53 Ind. 441; Branham v. Johnson, 62 Ind. 259; Moore v. Slack, 140 Ind. 38, 39 N.E. 237. In the case of Moore v. Stack supra, the Supreme Court of this State say: "In a notice on the appellees of such motion to substitute they state that said Belinda A. Moore died before...