Dockery v. McMillan, No. 314P87
| Docket Nº | No. 314P87 |
| Citation | 358 S.E.2d 49, 320 N.C. 167 |
| Case Date | July 07, 1987 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Page 49
v.
Robert B. McMILLAN, d/b/a McMillan Homes, Incorporated, Employer;
Non-Insured, and/or Randy Dockery, Employer;
Non-Insured, Defendants.
B. Garrison Ballenger, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant McMillan Homes, Inc.
Don H. Bumgardner, Gastonia, for plaintiff.
Page 50
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (McMillan Homes, Inc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of July 1987."
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 practice notes
-
Hojnacki v. Last Rebel Trucking Inc., No. COA09-460 (N.C. App. 1/5/2010), No. COA09-460.
...the establishment of contracts, express or implied." Dockery v. McMillan, 85 N.C. App. 469, 473, 355 S.E.2d 153, 155, disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 (1987) (internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, we must determine whether the evidence contained in the record establishes ......
-
Hughart v. Dasco Transp., Inc., No. COA03-1295.
...153, 155 (quoting Hollowell v. N.C. Dep't of Conservation & Dev., 206 N.C. 206, 208, 173 S.E. 603, 604 (1934)), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 We must, therefore, first address the question whether the evidence established that there was a contract, express or implied, bet......
-
Wiley v. Armstrong Transfer & Storage Co., No. COA17-850
...establishment of contracts, express or implied.’ " Dockery v. McMillan , 85 N.C. App. 469, 473, 355 S.E.2d 153, 155, disc. review denied , 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 (1987) (quoting Hollowell v. NC Dep't of Conservation and Dev. , 206 N.C. 206, 208, 173 S.E. 603, 604 (1934) ). Hence, the a......
-
State v. Frazier, No. COA00-122.
...relationship arises out of contract, whether express or implied. See Dockery v. McMillan, 85 N.C.App. 469, 355 S.E.2d 153, review denied, 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 (1987); Holleman v. Taylor, 200 N.C. 618, 158 S.E. 88 (1931). There was neither an express nor an implied contract under thes......
4 cases
-
Hojnacki v. Last Rebel Trucking Inc., No. COA09-460 (N.C. App. 1/5/2010), COA09-460.
...the establishment of contracts, express or implied." Dockery v. McMillan, 85 N.C. App. 469, 473, 355 S.E.2d 153, 155, disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 (1987) (internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, we must determine whether the evidence contained in the record establishes ......
-
Hughart v. Dasco Transp., Inc., COA03-1295.
...153, 155 (quoting Hollowell v. N.C. Dep't of Conservation & Dev., 206 N.C. 206, 208, 173 S.E. 603, 604 (1934)), disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 We must, therefore, first address the question whether the evidence established that there was a contract, express or implied, bet......
-
Wiley v. Armstrong Transfer & Storage Co., COA17-850
...establishment of contracts, express or implied.’ " Dockery v. McMillan , 85 N.C. App. 469, 473, 355 S.E.2d 153, 155, disc. review denied , 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 (1987) (quoting Hollowell v. NC Dep't of Conservation and Dev. , 206 N.C. 206, 208, 173 S.E. 603, 604 (1934) ). Hence, the a......
-
State v. Frazier, COA00-122.
...relationship arises out of contract, whether express or implied. See Dockery v. McMillan, 85 N.C.App. 469, 355 S.E.2d 153, review denied, 320 N.C. 167, 358 S.E.2d 49 (1987); Holleman v. Taylor, 200 N.C. 618, 158 S.E. 88 (1931). There was neither an express nor an implied contract under thes......