Dodd v. State
Decision Date | 17 April 1941 |
Docket Number | 7 Div. 654 |
Citation | 241 Ala. 152,1 So.2d 671 |
Parties | DODD v. STATE |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Jas. A. Hare Asst. Atty. Gen., for the petition.
McCord & Miller, of Gadsden, and Scruggs & Creel, of Guntersville, opposed.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals reversed this case on the ground that the trial court erred in excusing a juror at a time when neither the defendant(appellant) nor his counsel was present, even though the judge of the trial court had endorsed on the summons of the absent special juror the following: "11-27-39 This juror is excused on account of the exemption given him under Section 1600(86) Code of Alabama, 1923."(sic.)
In view of the above, petitioner requests that this petition for a writ of certiorari be granted and that this Court direct the Court of Appeals to affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The arraignment was on the 17th day of November, 1939, the trial was set for December 6, 1939, and we judicially know that the endorsement of the judge on the juror's summons (11-27-39) was not on the date of his arraignment or on the date of defendant's trial.
The excused juror, one W. Owen Leach, a member of the National Guard, was exempted by law (Section 11, Military Code, 1936 Gen.Act1936, Ex.Sess. p. 108, as amended by Act No. 509 General Acts 1939, p. 774), which in pertinent part is as follows:
The operation of this proof of exemption is predicated upon "liability to call for military duty during their term of service, every officer and enlisted man of the National Guard and Naval Militia of Alabama."
The state insists that there can be no doubt that when the certificate of membership is presented to the court, the court is under a mandatory duty to excuse the holder from jury duty.The law does not lodge in the trial court the discretionary powers the court has in excusing jurors who are exempted ordinarily from jury duty.
By the terms of Section 8605, Code of 1923, as amended by the General Acts of 1936, Extra Session, p. 33, the classes of persons who are declared exempt from jury duty are set forth, but such persons may serve on the jury with their own consent.By the terms of the amendment of Section 11 of the Military Code, General Acts 1939, p. 774, § 4 members of the National Guard are declared exempt during active membership therein and a certificate of membership signed by the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Waller v. State
...94, 155 So. 719; Crump v. State, 28 Ala.App. 103, 179 So. 392; Dodd v. State, 30 Ala.App. 96, 1 So.2d 670, certiorari denied 241 Ala. 152, 1 So.2d 671. Assistant Attorney General does not question the fact that the instant inquiry presents an unsurmountable authoritative precedent, but insi......
-
Stanford v. State
...no response from Leonard Hicks. The appellant relies heavily on the case of Dodd v. State, 30 Ala.App. 96, 1 So.2d 670, cert. den., 241 Ala. 152, 1 So.2d 671. In the Dodd case, Supra, the Court excused a member of the venire outside of the presence of the defendant's counsel. This is, of co......
-
Blackmon v. State
... ... 571, it was ... declared that statutes permitting courts to excuse ... prospective jurors cannot be construed as modifying statutes ... requiring the court to order venire in capital cases; that ... they may be summoned to appear and examined as to their ... qualifications. And in Dodd v. State, 241 Ala. 152, ... 1 So.2d 671, the Smallwood case, supra, was referred to and ... the reason for the rule that obtains stated to be that it was ... in order that the defendant may know of the exemptions ... claimed by the prospective juror, and the grounds on which ... the court ... ...
-
Lassiter v. State
...Ala. 428, 143 So. 454; Smallwood v. State, 235 Ala. 425, 179 So. 217; Dodd v. State, 30 Ala.App. 96, 1 So.2d 670, certiorari denied 241 Ala. 152, 1 So.2d 671; Waller v. State, 32 Ala.App. 586, 28 So.2d 815; Draper v. State, 250 Ala. 679, 36 So.2d 73; Hall v. State, 250 Ala. 681, 36 So.2d Be......