Dodd v. United States

Decision Date09 June 1954
Docket NumberNo. 4822.,4822.
PartiesDODD v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

James W. Wilson, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Milton P. Beach, Oskaloosa, Kan., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Dodd pleaded guilty to the first five counts of an indictment which charged him with interstate transportation of falsely made and forged checks in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. He was sentenced to serve a term of five years on each count. The sentences imposed upon counts one and two were to run consecutively, while the sentences on counts three, four and five were to run concurrently with that imposed on count one. He is now serving the first count sentence. Dodd has filed a motion in which he seeks to have the sentences vacated and to be placed on probation. The sole ground for this relief is that he was mentally incompetent at the time that he entered his plea of guilty. He has heretofore unsuccessfully sought relief from these sentences upon the same ground. Dodd v. United States, 10 Cir., 196 F.2d 190, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 987, 72 S.Ct. 1084, 96 L.Ed. 1374. This appeal is from a denial of the motion.

We need not consider the question relating to the power of the District Court to grant probation after the beginning of the service of a sentence imposed on one count but prior to the beginning of a sentence imposed on another count. United States v. Murray, 275 U.S. 347, 48 S.Ct. 146, 72 L.Ed. 309. Granting of probation rests in the sound discretion of the sentencing court and, "the exercise of that discretion cannot be questioned on appeal, except for arbitrary or capricious action amounting to a gross abuse of discretion." Humes v. United States, 10 Cir., 186 F.2d 875, 878. No such abuse of discretion appears in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Woosley v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 24, 1973
    ...States, 370 F.2d 126, 129 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1033, 87 S.Ct. 1484, 18 L.Ed.2d 595 (1967); Dodd v. United States, 213 F.2d 854, 855 (10th Cir. 1954); Sullivan v. United States, 212 F.2d 125, 128 (10th Cir.), aff'd, 348 U.S. 170, 75 S.Ct. 182, 99 L.Ed. 210 (1954); Humes v......
  • Stone v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 11, 1966
    ...28 U.S.Code. Dodd v. United States, 10 Cir., 1952, 196 F.2d 190, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 987, 72 S.Ct. 1084, 96 L.Ed. 1374; 10 Cir., 1954, 213 F.2d 854; 10 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 175; Handlon v. United States, 6 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d Appellant subsequently filed several petitions, one in th......
  • Stone v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • August 2, 1960
    ...Dodd v. United States, 10 Cir., 1952, 196 F.2d 190, certiorari denied 72 S.Ct. 1084, 96 L. Ed. 1374; 10 Cir., 1954, 343 U.S. 987, 213 F.2d 854; 10 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 175; Handlon v. United States, 6 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d In the Dodd case, much the same procedure occurred as here: the Court......
  • Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of Texas v. Lane
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 20, 1954
    ... ... MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. CO. OF TEXAS ... LANE et al ... No. 14503 ... United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit ... June 25, 1954 ... Rehearing Denied July 20, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT