Dodge v. Bardsley

Decision Date12 December 1933
Citation169 A. 306
PartiesDODGE v. BARDSLEY et al.
CourtMaine Supreme Court

Exceptions from Superior Court Cumberland County.

Action by Margaret Dodge against Joseph T. Bardsley and others.The court found for defendants, and plaintiff brings exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

Argued before PATTANGALL, C. J., and DUNN, STURGIS, BARNES, and THAXTER, JJ.

Harry E. Nixon, of Portland, for plaintiff.

John P. Deering, of Saco, and Jacob H. Berman, of Portland, for defendants.

THAXTEB, Justice.

This case is an action of debt heard by the presiding justice, who found for the defendants.It is before us on exceptions.

The pleadings, exhibits, agreed statement of facts, and the findings and rulings of the presiding justice are made a part of the bill of exceptions.The bill then states: "To all which rulings the plaintiff hereby excepts and prays that her exceptions may be allowed, she having been aggrieved by said rulings."The specific objections of the defendants are set forth with no further particularity.

Rev. St. 1930, c. 91, § 24, provides that any party aggrieved by the rulings of the presiding justice may "present written exceptions in a summary manner," which, when allowed, shall be transmitted to this court for decision.

The purpose of a bill of exceptions is to present in clear and specific phrasing the issues of law to be considered by this court.Each ruling objected to should be clearly and separately set forth.The very purpose of the bill is to withdraw from the mass of rulings those which it is claimed are erroneous, and exceptions are only presented in a "summary manner" in accordance with the statute when they are "stated separately, pointedly, concisely."McKown v. Powers, 86 Me. 291, 295, 29 A. 1079, 1081.

The method adopted by counsel here attempts to bring before this court indiscriminately all the rulings of the presiding justice, and subverts the very purpose of the statute.The...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Bradford v. Davis Same
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 9 December 1947
    ...The purpose of a bill of exceptions is to put the decision objected to upon record for the information of the Law Court. Dodge v. Bardsley, 132 Me. 230, 169 A. 306. Bills must be presented ‘during the term’, to the justice presiding, stating each issue of law in a clear, distinct, and ‘summ......
  • Mac Motor Sales v. Pate
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 27 June 1952
    ...forth. The very purpose of the bill is to withdraw from the mass of rulings those which it is claimed are erroneous'. Dodge v. Bardsley, 132 Me. 230, 231, 169 A. 306. See also Bradford v. Davis, 143 Me. 124, 56 A.2d The erroneous ruling that the record of the 'Certificate to be Recorded' wa......
  • Public Loan Corp. v. Bodwell-Leighton Co.
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 14 June 1952
    ...136 Me. 401, 11 A.2d 613; Wallace v. Gilley, 136 Me. 523, 12 A.2d 416; Gerrish, Ex'r, v. Chambers, 135 Me. 70, 189 A. 187; Dodge v. Bardsley, 132 Me. 230, 169 A. 306; Jones v. Jones, 101 Me. 447, 64 A. 815; McKown v. Powers, 86 Me. 291, 29 A. The bill of exceptions does not set forth any er......
  • State v. Whitehead
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 2 August 1955
    ...and cannot be considered. Each ruling objected to must be clearly and separately set forth in the bill of exceptions. Dodge v. Bardsley, 132 Me. 230, 231, 169 A. 306; Bradford v. Davis, 143 Me. 124, 127, 56 A.2d 2. Exception was taken to the ruling, that counsel 'should confine his question......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT