Dodge v. Bell

CourtMinnesota Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtGILFILLAN
CitationDodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, 34 N.W. 739 (Minn. 1887)
Decision Date07 November 1887
PartiesDODGE, JR., EX'R, v BELL.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

(Syllabus by the Court.)

An order denying a motion to vacate an order sustaining a demurrer, and for a “new trial” on the demurrer, is not an order refusing a new trial, so as to be appealable, under section 8, c. 86, Gen. St. 1878.

Appeal from district court, Ramsey county; SIMONS, Judge.

T. T. Alexander, for Dodge, appellant.

Homer C. Eller and Chas. N. Bell, for Bell, respondent.

GILFILLAN, C. J.

The defendant demurred to the plaintiff's complaint, and the demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff then made a motion that the court below vacate the order sustaining the demurrer, and “grant him a new trial.” This motion was denied, and from the order denying it the plaintiff appeals to this court.

The order is not appealable. It is not an order refusing a new trial, within the meaning of the fourth subdivision of section 8, c. 86, Gen. St. 1878, giving a right of appeal. This subdivision must be understood to refer to orders granting or refusing new trials in the cases provided by the statute. It is true that a trial is defined by section 214, c. 66, to be “the judicial examination of the issues between the parties, whether they are issues of law or of fact.” But it is not to all trials within that definition that the provisions of sections 253-255, inclusive, of chapter 66, authorizing and regulating applications for new trials, apply. Seven grounds for such application are specified in section 253. By section 254, applications on the fourth, fifth, and seventh of these grounds are to be made upon bills of exceptions or statements of the case, prepared as prescribed in section 255, or upon the judge's minutes. When made for any other cause, they are made upon affidavits. Neither of these modes is applicable to a mere ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Safeway Stores v. Coe
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • May 29, 1943
    ...366, 367. See, generally, Gunn v. Union R. Co., 23 R.I. 289, 49 A. 999, 1002; Warner v. Goding, 91 Fla. 260, 107 So. 406. 6 37 Minn. 382, 383, 34 N.W. 739, 740. 7 75 F.2d 804, 805, 806. 8 Watkins v. Sedberry, 155 Tenn. 148, 290 S.W. 970; Buchanan v. James, 134 Ga. 475, 68 S.E. 72; Schneidt ......
  • State v. Nelson
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • March 4, 1959
    ...the same court after a verdict by a jury. Garden City Feeder Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 8 Cir., 75 F.2d 804; Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, 34 N.W. 739; Warner v. Goding, 91 Fla. 260, 107 So. 406; Carpenter v. Sixth Judicial District Court, 59 Nev. 42, 73 P.2d 1310, 84 P.2d 489;......
  • Garden City Feeder Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • February 14, 1935
    ...sufficient reason has been set aside, so that the issues may be relitigated. Hine v. Myrick, 60 Minn. 518, 62 N. W. 1125; Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, 34 N. W. 739; Gott v. Judge of Superior Court, 42 Mich. 625, 4 N. W. 529; Star Bottling Co. v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co., 240 Mo. 63......
  • In re Jaus' Guardianship
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1936
    ...would not lie and that it was necessary for him to make an application to set it aside. In this he was clearly in error. See Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, 34 N.W. 739; St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels, 55 Minn. 155, 56 N.W. 592; In re Appeal of Seward, 2. Is the order here for review an ap......
  • Get Started for Free