Dodson-Braun Mfg. Co. v. Dix
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Neill |
| Citation | Dodson-Braun Mfg. Co. v. Dix, 76 S.W. 451 (Tex. App. 1903) |
| Decision Date | 14 October 1903 |
| Parties | DODSON-BRAUN MFG. CO. v. DIX. |
Appeal from Bexar County Court; Robt. B. Green, Judge.
Action by Ford Dix against the Dodson-Braun Manufacturing Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.
W. H. Lipscomb, for appellant.
The only contention of appellant is that the employment of appellee was for no particular length of time, and that, therefore, it had the right to discharge him at any time without cause. The evidence relied upon to support this contention is the following testimony of the appellee: This undoubtedly shows an employment from month to month.
When the hiring is from month to month, each party has the right to terminate it at the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Dallas Hotel Co. v. McCue, 10479.
...to be received. Young v. Lewis, 9 Tex. 73; San Antonio & A. P. Railway Co. v. Sale (Tex. Civ. App.) 31 S. W. 325; Dodson-Braun Mfg. Co. v. Dix (Tex. Civ. App.) 76 S. W. 451; Crater Oil Co. v. Voorhies (Tex. Civ. App.) 280 S. W. 849; Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson (Tex. Civ. App.) 8 S.W.(......
-
Crawford v. Jennie Stewart. Mrs. W. H. Crawford
...which he is liable for a month's wages if he discharges his employee without cause before the expiration of the month.” In Dodson-Braun Mfg. Co. v. Dix, 76 S. W. 451, is an instance of an oral contract for services to be rendered from month to month, in which the services had been commenced......
-
Accidental Oil Mills v. Tomlinson
...impliedly renews itself for a period of one year. Crater Oil Co. v. Voorhies (Tex. Civ. App.) 280 S. W. 849; Dodson-Braun Mfg. Co. v. Dicks (Tex. Civ. App.) 76 S. W. 451; Tex. Brewing Co. v. Walters (Tex. Civ. App.) 43 S. W. 548; Young v. Lewis, 9 Tex. But appellant further insists in this ......
-
Crater Oil Co. v. Voorhies
...and can be terminated only at the end of a month, except by consent of the parties. Young v. Lewis, 9 Tex. 73; Dodson-Braum Mfg. Co. v. Dix (Tex. Civ. App.) 76 S. W. 451; Railway Co. v. Sale (Tex. Civ. App.) 31 S. W. 325; Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co., 85 N. E. 877, 200 Mass. 1; Mol......