Doe v. Dep't Of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs.
| Docket Number | 125/11 |
| Decision Date | 04 March 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
104 cases
-
State v. Davidson
...registration statutes. See Wallace v. State , 905 N.E.2d 371, 377-78, 384 (Ind. 2009) ; Doe v. Dept. of Public Safety and Correctional Services , 430 Md. 535, 547-48, 553, 62 A.3d 123 (2013) ; State v. Williams , 129 Ohio St. 3d 344, 347-49, 952 N.E.2d 1108 (2011) ; Starkey v. Oklahoma Dept......
-
Doe v. State
...See Smith, 538 U.S. at 111, 123 S.Ct. 1140 (Stevens, J., dissenting); Starkey, 305 P.3d at 1022–23 ; Doe v. Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., 430 Md. 535, 62 A.3d 123, 139 (2013).Other courts have found that in-person requirements do not amount to an affirmative restraint or disability. ......
-
Twigg v. State
...application of the 1990 amendment violates Maryland or federal ex post facto laws does not arise. See Doe v. Dep't of Pub. Safety and Corr. Servs., 430 Md. 535, 568–69, 62 A.3d 123 (2013) (holding that the Maryland sex offense registry statute, which is expressly made retroactive, violates ......
-
State v. Todd
...ex post facto [l]aw.” We have no echoing or comparable provision in the Kansas Constitution. Contra Doe v. Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., 430 Md. 535, 551–59, 62 A.3d 123 (2013) (electing to invoke Maryland Constitution to provide broader protection than federal Ex Post Facto Clause).......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Accept Or Qualify the Guilty Plea and the Requirements Under the Due Process Clause and Md. Rule 4-242
...consequences, and the defendant must be advised of such potential consequences. In Doe v. Dep't of Public Safety & Correctional Servs., 430 Md. 535 (2013), the Court of Appeals held that being placed on a sex offender registry is punishment, which implicates the prohibition against ex post ......
-
Prohibition Against Ex Post Facto Laws
...application does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. Id. at 105-06. In Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, 430 Md. 535 (2013), the defendant was convicted in 1996 of one count of child sex abuse. The conviction was based on an act of the defendant when he was a sch......
-
Text of the Fourth Amendment and Md. Decl. of Rights Art. 26
...provisions in the Maryland Constitution that have federal counterparts. In Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, 430 Md. 535 (2013), the Court stated: Many provisions of the Maryland Constitution . . . have counterparts in the United States Constitution. We have often ......
-
Sex Offender Registration
...See also Connecticut Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1, 7-8 (2003). In Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, 430 Md. 535 (2013), the Court of Appeals held that the requirement to register as a sexual offender is part of the defendant's sentence, and it is not mer......
Get Started for Free