Doe v. MADISON SCHOOL DIST. NO. 321, 97-35642.
Decision Date | 19 March 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 97-35642.,97-35642. |
Citation | 165 F.3d 1265 |
Parties | Jane DOE, on her own behalf and on behalf of her two children; Doe 1; Doe 2, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 321; Board of Trustees of District No. 321; Jim Terry, member of Board; Ann Hancock, member of Board; John Bagley, member of Board; Norman Erickson, member of Board; Gary J. Summers, member of Board; T.C. Mattocks, Dr., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Doe v. Madison School District, No. 97-35642, slip op. at 5361 (9th Cir. May 27, 1998) and the three-judge panel published order, Doe v. Madison School District, No. 97-35642, slip op. at 597 (9th Cir. Jan. 22, 1999) are withdrawn.
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
Adler v. Duval County School Bd.
...is indistinguishable from Doe v. Madison School District No. 321, 147 F.3d 832 (9th Cir.1998), withdrawn & reh'g en banc granted, 165 F.3d 1265 (9th Cir.1999), where the Ninth Circuit held that graduation speech does not bear the imprimatur of the state when the speaker is a student, not a ......
-
Doe v. Madison School Dist. No. 321
...active Ninth Circuit judges voted to rehear both panel decisions en banc, and the decisions were withdrawn. See Doe v. Madison Sch. Dist. No. 321, 165 F.3d 1265 (9th Cir.1999). STANDING Ordinarily, to prove an injury in fact under Article III of the Constitution, the plaintiff need only all......
- United States v. Turner