Doe v. Myspace, Inc.

Decision Date22 May 2009
Docket NumberCase No. 4:08-CV-140.
Citation629 F.Supp.2d 663
PartiesJane DOE IX, Individually and as Next Friend of Julie Doe IX, a Minor, Plaintiffs, v. MYSPACE, INC., Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas

RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.

The following are pending before the court:

1. Defendant MySpace, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry # 17);

2. Plaintiffs' response to Defendant MySpace, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (docket entry # 19); and

3. Defendant MySpace, Inc.'s reply in support of motion to dismiss (docket entry # 20).

Having considered the Defendant's motion and the responsive briefing thereto, the court finds that the motion should be granted.

The Plaintiff herein, individually and as next friend of her then 15-year-old daughter, brought a state court action against the Defendant for negligence, gross negligence and strict product liability for failing to implement reasonable safety measures to protect minors. In her complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that her daughter "was lured from her home and sexually assaulted by a sexual predator, who communicated with her and ultimately orchestrated his sexual assault of her through the MySpace.com website." PL. SECOND AMD. PETITION, p. 2, ¶ 8. The Defendant subsequently removed the Plaintiff's lawsuit to this court. In response to the Plaintiff's allegations, the Defendant moved to dismiss the Plaintiff's claims, asserting that the Plaintiff's claims are barred by the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230 ("CDA").

47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states as follows:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service1 shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.2

In response in opposition to the Defendant's assertion of immunity under the CDA, the Plaintiff argues (1) that the Defendant is liable and not entitled to CDA immunity because it refused to employ reasonable safety measures on its website, and (2) that the Defendant acted as an information content provider by creating and developing information that led to the injuries alleged.

The Plaintiff's first argument is foreclosed by Doe v. MySpace, Inc., 528 F.3d 413 (5th Cir.2008), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 600, 172 L.Ed.2d 456 (2008). In Doe, the Fifth Circuit held as follows:

Their claims are barred by the CDA, notwithstanding their assertion that they only seek to hold MySpace liable for its failure to implement measures that would have prevented Julie Doe from communicating with Solis. Their allegations are merely another way of claiming that MySpace was liable for publishing the communications and they speak to MySpace's role as a publisher of online third-party-generated content.

Id. at 420.

However, the Fifth Circuit in Doe did not address the Plaintiff's second argument to wit: that the CDA should not apply to the Defendant because it was partially responsible for creating information exchanged between Julie Doe and the sexual predator. Id. at 422. In response to the Defendant's motion to dismiss, the Plaintiff argues that the Defendant acted as an information content provider; therefore, the Defendant is not entitled to CDA immunity.

The Plaintiff argues that once a MySpace user creates a profile by entering a name, email address, gender, country and date of birth, the website automatically displays the user's zodiac sign. The user is then prompted, but not required, to enter additional information about "Interests & Personality," "Name," "Basic Info," "Background and Lifestyle," "Schools," "Companies," "Networking," and "Song & Video on Profile." Users are prompted to additional links as well.

A user's profile also contains links to the "Browse" and "Search" functions which allow the user to view and locate other profiles according to certain criteria. Additionally, users may also contact other users via email and messaging programs built into MySpace.

Based on these facts, and relying solely on Fair Housing...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • In re Facebook, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 25, 2021
    ...Appx. at 590 ; Inman v. Technicolor USA, Inc. , No. 11-cv-666, 2011 WL 5829024, at *8 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2011) ; Doe v. MySpace, Inc. , 629 F. Supp. 2d 663 (E.D. Tex. 2009).10 This result aligns with the Fifth Circuit's 2008 decision in a case involving very similar facts. There, the plaint......
  • Fraley v. Facebook, Inc
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • December 16, 2011
    ...Inc., 695 F.Supp.2d 1117, 1122–23 (E.D.Cal.2010); Goddard v. Google, Inc., 640 F.Supp.2d 1193, 1197 (N.D.Cal.2009); Doe IX v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F.Supp.2d 663 (E.D.Tex.2009); Doe II v. MySpace, Inc., 175 Cal.App.4th 561, 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 148 (2009); and others). Defendant's reliance on these ......
  • Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • December 16, 2011
    ...F. Supp. 2d 1117, 1122-23 (E.D. Cal. 2010); Goddard v. Google, Inc., 640 F. Supp. 2d 1193, 1197 (N.D. Cal. 2009); Doe IX v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F. Supp. 2d 663 (E.D. Tex. 2009); Doe II v. MySpace, Inc., 175 Cal. App. 4th 561 (2009); and others). Defendant's reliance on these cases is misplac......
  • Goddard v. Google, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • July 30, 2009
    ...added), it carved out only a narrow exception to that rule. See Goddard, 2008 WL 5245490, at *3; see also Doe v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F.Supp.2d 663, 665 (E.D.Tex.2009) (finding Roommates "not applicable" to an action against the social utility website MySpace.com, because, whereas "[t]he Nint......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • ENJOINING NON-LIABLE PLATFORMS.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Vol. 34 No. 1, September 2020
    • September 22, 2020
    ...528 F.3d 413, 418 (5th Cir. 2008); Jurin v. Google, Inc., 695 F. Supp. 2d 1117, 1122-23 (E.D. Cal. 2010); Doe IX v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F. Supp. 2d 663, 665 (E.D. Tex. 2009); Doe II v. MySpace, Inc., 96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 148, 156-59 (Cal. Ct. App. (59.) No. 17-CV-05359, 2017 WL 5665670 (N.D. Cal......
  • Product-related Privity, Preemption, and the Internet Marketplace
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Journal of Emerging Issues in Litigation No. 1-1, January 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...(CDA precluded all claims against internet retailers for injury from allegedly toxic products purchased online); Doe v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F. Supp. 2d 663, 665-66 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (CDA barred strict product liability claim); Reyes v. LA VaporWorks, 2017 WL 1717406, at *1-2 (Cal. Super. Feb.......
  • How broad is Web publisher immunity under (section) 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996?
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 84 No. 2, February 2010
    • February 1, 2010
    ...people steal music or other material in copyright). (67) Roommates.com, 521 F.3d at 1174. (68) Id. at 1167; see Doe v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F. Supp. 2d 663, 665 (E.D. Tex. (69) Barnes, 565 F.3d at 571-72. (70) Id. at 572. Samuel J. Morley is general counsel at the Florida Press Association, a......
  • Paying for Nude Celebrities: Testing the Outer Limits of Roommates.com, Accusearch, and Section 230 Immunity
    • United States
    • University of Whashington School of Law Journal of Law, Technology & Arts No. 11-2, October 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...129 F.3d 327, 331 (4th Cir. 1997). 40. Goddard v. Google, Inc., 640 F. Supp. 2d 1193, 1198-99 (N.D. Cal. 2009); Doe v. MySpace, Inc., 629 F. Supp. 2d 663, 665 (E.D. Tex. 2009); Atl. Recording Corp. v. Project Playlist., 603 F. Supp. 2d 690, 701 (S.D.N.Y. 41. See Fair Hous. Council of San Fe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT