Doe v. Richards

Decision Date30 November 1853
PartiesDoe on the Demise of Pidgeon v. Richards
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

ERROR to the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded.

A. A Hammond and H. O'Neal, for the plaintiff.

W Herod, S. Stansifer, W. Singleton and R. Hill, for the defendant.

OPINION

Perkins J.

Ejectment by Doe on the demise of William F. Pidgeon, against Thomas J. Richards for a tract of land in Bartholomew county. Judgment below for the defendant.

The facts of the case are, that William Richards, then the owner in fee of the land in question, died in 1846 having devised said land to his wife, Elizabeth Richards, for her life. Subsequently, said Elizabeth leased the land to her son, Thomas J. Richards, the defendant, who was then living upon it with his mother, executing to him an instrument as follows:

"Article of agreement between Thomas J. Richards of the first part, and Elizabeth Richards of the second part, witnesseth, that the said Thomas J. Richards is to occupy the premises that he now occupies, with full privileges to improve at his pleasure, and enjoy all the privileges of ownership, and to occupy so long as he desires; and in consideration therefor, the said party of the first part hereby obligates himself to grant unto the said Elizabeth Richards the privilege of living within his house and enjoying all that is necessary to health and comfort at his expense. And in case of the death or removal of the party of the first part, the place to revert to the party of the second part. It is further agreed that the said Thomas J. Richards has privilege to sell or dispose of the stock and other appurtenances belonging to the farm, the same as though he was prime owner." Signed by the parties and sealed, October 25, 1848.

After the execution of this instrument, said Thomas and Elizabeth continued to reside together on the land, he exercising full control, till the spring of 1851, when said Elizabeth left, having deeded the premises to the lessor of the plaintiff, Pidgeon, and given said Thomas notice to quit.

This suit was commenced March 19, 1851. The only brief furnished is a very brief one from the plaintiff, informing us that the case turned below upon the effect of the lease or instrument in writing above set out, and that it was there held that it conveyed a life estate to said Thomas J. Richards. The substance of that instrument is that it gives to Richards the right to occupy and improve the land in question for a certain consideration, payable as he occupies, as long as he shall please to do so. It gives him no absolute interest, which he can convey to another on vacating the premises himself. Whenever he removes from them, his right in them ceases. And he is not bound to occupy them and pay the consideration a day longer than he sees fit to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Lindlay v. Raydure
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Kentucky
    • February 3, 1917
    ... ... The instrument was ... therefore at the very least a lease in perpetuity at the will ... of the lessee.' ... These ... two decisions may appear to be to the contrary, to wit: ... Cheever v. Pearson, 16 Pick. (Mass.) 266; Doe v ... Richards, 4 Ind. 374. In the Massachusetts case, liberty ... was granted by a Congregational society to certain persons to ... erect a seminary on the parsonage land, with liberty to ... remove the same at pleasure. The building was erected ... Thereafter the lessor gave notice to quit and brought ... ...
  • Eclipse Oil Co. v. South Penn Oil Co.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1899
    ...Co., 83 Va. 547, 3 S.E. 120; Petroleum Co. v. Coal, Coke & Mfg. Co., 89 Tenn. 381, 18 S.W. 65; Knight v. Iron Co., 47 Ind. 105; Pidgeon v. Richards, 4 Ind. 374; 2 Bl. 135. The lessee was out nothing, at no expense, and running no risk, and yet he makes the conditions of his contract such th......
  • Eclipse Oil Co v. South Penn Oil Co
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1899
    ...547, 3 S. E. 120; Petroleum Co. v. Coal, Coke & Mfg. Co., 89 Tenn. 381, 18 S. W. 65; Knight v. Iron Co., 47 Ind. 105; Pidgeon v. Richards, 4 Ind. 374; 2 Bl. Comm. 135. The lessee was out nothing, at no expense, and running no risk, and yet he makes the conditions of his contract such that t......
  • Indian Ref. Co. v. Roberts
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • May 20, 1932
    ...will of the lessor.” II Blackstone, 145. This has also been extended by our courts to include estates at the will of the lessee. Doe v. Richards, 4 Ind. 374. But as was said in Brown et al. v. Fowler et al. (1902) 65 Ohio St. 507, 63 N. E. 76, 78, a case quite similar to the instant case, e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT