Doescher v. Estelle

Decision Date22 May 1979
Docket NumberNo. 78-3087,78-3087
Citation597 F.2d 281
PartiesDoescher v. Estelle *
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

N.D.Tex., 454 F.Supp. 943

DISMISSED ***

*** Opinion contains citation(s) or special notations.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Harris v. Champion
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • January 26, 1994
    ... ... Sec. 2254; see also Estelle v. McGuire, --- U.S. ----, ----, 112 S.Ct. 475, 480, 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991) ("[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state ... -half-month delay in adjudicating a motion for post-conviction relief was not so egregious as to violate petitioner's due process rights); Doescher v. Estelle, 454 F.Supp. 943, 952 (N.D.Tex.1978) (determining as a matter of law that a one-year delay in processing petitioner's appeal was not ... ...
  • Dias v. Maloney
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • August 2, 2001
    ... ... 282, 284, 535 N.E.2d 208 [1989], which cites Commonwealth v. Lee, 394 Mass. 209, 220, 475 N.E.2d 363 [1985], which relies upon Doescher v. Estelle, 454 F.Supp. 943, 949-50 [N.D.Tex. 1978] [citing, inter alia, United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 92 S.Ct. 455, 30 L.Ed.2d 468 ... ...
  • Doescher v. Estelle
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • August 31, 1979
    ...the appeal of Doescher v. Estelle, 454 F.Supp. 943 (N.D.Tex.1978) as moot in an opinion issued on May 22, 1979. Doescher v. Estelle, 597 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1979). Petitioner requested that this Court reopen his case and hear his application for habeas corpus because he had now exhausted his......
  • Cousart v. Hammock, CV 83-1559.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • January 4, 1984
    ... ...         Delay in the processing of an appeal may constitute a violation of the right to due process. Doescher v. Estelle, 454 F.Supp. 943, 950 (N.D.Tex.1978), app. dismissed, 597 F.2d 281 (5th Cir.1979). Having said this, we see no reason to discuss ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT