Dolan v. Hudson, 10416

Citation159 N.W.2d 128,83 S.D. 331
Decision Date29 May 1968
Docket NumberNo. 10416,10416
CourtSupreme Court of South Dakota
PartiesRaymond B. DOLAN and M. Theresa Dolan, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Douglas M. HUDSON and Arlene E. Hudson, Defendants and Appellants. Douglas M. HUDSON and Arlene E. Hudson, Cross-Complainants and Appellants, v. Raymond B. DOLAN, M. Theresa Dolan and Pfeifer-Drake & Dodge Company, Defendants under the Cross-Complaint and Respondents.

Jones & Matthews, E.G. Jones, Sioux Falls, for defendants and appellants.

May, Boe & Johnson, Sioux Falls, for plaintiffs and respondents.

PER CURIAM.

After defendants' petition for rehearing was granted in this case further argument was heard. Having reconsidered arguments presented on rehearing, a majority of the court is not disposed to recede from the views expressed in the former opinion reported in, S.D., 156 N.W.2d 78. We, therefore, adhere to that opinion and the judgment dated September 22, 1966 and the subsequent orders however denominated are hereby affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • American Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Madison v. Kass
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 16, 1982
    ... ... Edelman, 75 S.D. 29, 58 N.W.2d 306." Doland v. Hudson", 83 S.D. 144, 148, 156 N.W.2d 78, 80 (1968) rehearing 83 S.D. 331, 156 N.W.2d 78 (1968) ...    \xC2" ... ...
  • Hanks v. Hanks, s. 12744
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 3, 1980
  • Mattson v. Rachetto, 20543
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1999
    ...(citing Wiggins v. Shewmake, 374 N.W.2d 111 (S.D.1985); Dolan v. Hudson, 83 S.D. 144, 156 N.W.2d 78, aff'd on rehearing, 83 S.D. 331, 159 N.W.2d 128 (1968)). "We determine that an abuse of discretion occurred only if no judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances of the particul......
  • Amdahl v. Lowe, 17204
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1991
    ...of each case. Wiggins v. Shewmake, 374 N.W.2d 111 (S.D.1985); Dolan v. Hudson, 83 S.D. 144, 156 N.W.2d 78, aff'd on rehearing, 83 S.D. 331, 159 N.W.2d 128 (1968). Amdahl contends that it was an abuse of the trial court's discretion to refuse to grant specific performance because the court f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT