Dolan v. Hudson, 10416
Decision Date | 29 May 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 10416,10416 |
Citation | 159 N.W.2d 128,83 S.D. 331 |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Parties | Raymond B. DOLAN and M. Theresa Dolan, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Douglas M. HUDSON and Arlene E. Hudson, Defendants and Appellants. Douglas M. HUDSON and Arlene E. Hudson, Cross-Complainants and Appellants, v. Raymond B. DOLAN, M. Theresa Dolan and Pfeifer-Drake & Dodge Company, Defendants under the Cross-Complaint and Respondents. |
Jones & Matthews, E.G. Jones, Sioux Falls, for defendants and appellants.
May, Boe & Johnson, Sioux Falls, for plaintiffs and respondents.
After defendants' petition for rehearing was granted in this case further argument was heard. Having reconsidered arguments presented on rehearing, a majority of the court is not disposed to recede from the views expressed in the former opinion reported in, S.D., 156 N.W.2d 78. We, therefore, adhere to that opinion and the judgment dated September 22, 1966 and the subsequent orders...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Madison v. Kass
... ... Edelman, 75 S.D. 29, 58 N.W.2d 306." Doland v. Hudson", 83 S.D. 144, 148, 156 N.W.2d 78, 80 (1968) rehearing 83 S.D. 331, 156 N.W.2d 78 (1968) ... \xC2" ... ...
- Hanks v. Hanks, s. 12744
-
Mattson v. Rachetto, 20543
...(citing Wiggins v. Shewmake, 374 N.W.2d 111 (S.D.1985); Dolan v. Hudson, 83 S.D. 144, 156 N.W.2d 78, aff'd on rehearing, 83 S.D. 331, 159 N.W.2d 128 (1968)). "We determine that an abuse of discretion occurred only if no judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances of the particul......
-
Amdahl v. Lowe, 17204
...of each case. Wiggins v. Shewmake, 374 N.W.2d 111 (S.D.1985); Dolan v. Hudson, 83 S.D. 144, 156 N.W.2d 78, aff'd on rehearing, 83 S.D. 331, 159 N.W.2d 128 (1968). Amdahl contends that it was an abuse of the trial court's discretion to refuse to grant specific performance because the court f......