Domako, In re, A

Decision Date23 March 1953
Docket NumberNo. A,A
Citation11 N.J. 591,95 A.2d 505
PartiesEx parte DOMAKO. 117.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 20 N.J.Super. 314, 90 A.2d 30.

Benjamin Domako, in pro. per.

Eugene T. Urbaniak, Trenton, for respondent (Theodore D. Parsons, Atty. Gen).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the court below.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Cicenia v. La Gay
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1958
    ... ... See In re Domako, 20 N.J.Super. 314, 90 A.2d 30, affirmed 11 N.J. 591, 95 A.2d 505. Following that rule, the Essex County Court held that petitioner could not attack his conviction on habeas corpus. On appeal the Superior Court did not advert to that question, but affirmed the County Court on the ground that under ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT