Dombrosky v. Banach

• Decision Date: 24 May 2012
• Docket Number: CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-2579
• Parties: ROBERT A. DOMBROSKY, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND BANACH, ROBERT BROWN, LESTER BUCHANAN, ROBERT EWBANK, PAUL FISCHER, RICHARD GASSMAN, JAMES MUIR, ROBERT STEVENS, CHAD STEWART, EASTERN PIKE REGIONAL POLICE COMMISSION, and WESTFALL TOWNSHIP Defendants.
• Court: U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania

ROBERT A. DOMBROSKY, Plaintiff,

v.RAYMOND BANACH, ROBERT

BROWN, LESTER BUCHANAN, ROBERT EWBANK, PAUL FISCHER,

RICHARD GASSMAN, JAMES MUIR,

ROBERT STEVENS, CHAD STEWART,

EASTERN PIKE REGIONAL POLICE

COMMISSION, and WESTFALL TOWNSHIP Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-2579

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date: May 24, 2012

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

ORDER

NOW, this 24th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Defendant Raymond Banach's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 94) is DENIED.

(2) The Westfall Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 103) is DENIED.

(3) The Eastern Pike Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 108) is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Eastern Pike Regional Police Commission, Robert Brown in his capacity as an Eastern Pike Regional Police commissioner, Lester Buchanan in his capacity as an Eastern Pike Regional Police commissioner, Paul Fischer in his capacity as an Eastern Pike Regional Police commissioner, Richard Gassman, Robert Stevens, and Chad Stewart on all counts.

(4) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on liability is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

(a) The motion for summary judgment on liability against the Westfall Defendants and Mr. Banach on Counts Two and Three is GRANTED.

Page 2

(b) The motion is DENIED in all other respects.

________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge