Donahue v. Vaughn, 98-1750.
Citation | 721 So.2d 356 |
Decision Date | 23 October 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 98-1750.,98-1750. |
Parties | Gregory DONAHUE, Petitioner, v. Charles P. VAUGHN, Respondent. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Gregory Donahue, Jasper, Petitioner, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
This is before the court on a petition for writ of mandamus.
Petitioner seeks to have this court order his former attorney to furnish to him, free of charge, copies of documents, held by the attorney, or as petitioner puts it "all records in the above cause." We deny the writ for various reasons.
First, there is no duty upon a private attorney to give any of his files to a client, save documents which are solely those of the client and held by the lawyer. Pleadings, investigative reports, subpoena copies, reports and other case preparation documents are property of the lawyer. He is not required to give that material to the client or make copies free of charge.
Second, if appellant is indigent he can get documents from his court-appointed lawyer or public defender but he is not entitled to them free of charge:
Petitioner was represented at trial by a public defender of the Ninth Judicial Circuit and now seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the public defender to provide free copies of documents in the public defender's file. The contents of an attorney's file relating to professional services performed for a client are the personal property of the attorney, not the client. See Dowda and Fields, P.A. v. Cobb, 452 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
. Petitioner is not seeking transcripts which have been paid for at public expense, as in Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) and Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Although the Public Defender's Office is an agency which maintains public records which must be available for inspection under the florida Public Records Act, section 119.01, et seq., Fla. Stat. (1989), the act specifically provides that a custodian of public records shall furnish copies of those records "upon payment of the fee prescribed by law" and there is no provision for free copies. § 119.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). In the absence of a mandatory, ministerial duty on the part of the public defender to provide a former client with free copies of the attorney's file, mandamus is not appropriate.
Woodson v. Durocher, 588 So.2d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), rev. den., 598 So.2d 79 (Fla. 1992).
Third, mandamus does not lie to require a private citizen, appellee, to perform a "ministerial duty required by law." Mandamus in these circumstances only applies to government officials, like clerks of court. Not private lawyers. See Puckett v. Gentry, 577 So.2d 965, 967 (Fla. 5th DCA)
(, rev. denied, )591 So.2d 183 (Fla.1991).
Fourth, if he could require the production of "records" without payment, it would only be for plenary appeals, not post-conviction matters. See ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Villa Bellini Ristorante & Lounge, Inc. v. Mancini
...citizen and not a government official." See Hall v. Liebling, 890 So. 2d 475, 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; see also Donahue v. Vaughn, 721 So. 2d 356, 357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) ("[M]andamus does not lie to require a private citizen, appellee, to perform a ministerial duty required by law." (inter......
-
In re Fundamental Long Term Care, Inc.
...in either case. The sole authority for the Receiver's claim that the work product doctrine belongs to the attorney under state law is Donahue v. Vaughn.98 The Receiver cites that case for the proposition that “there is no duty upon a private attorney to give any of his files to a client, sa......
-
In re Fundamental Long Term Care, Inc., Case No. 8:11-bk-22258-MGW
...in either case. The sole authority for the Receiver's claim that the work product doctrine belongs to the attorney under state law is Donahue v. Vaughn98 The Receiver cites that case for the proposition that "there is no duty upon a private attorney to give any of his files to a client, sav......
-
In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar
...until the client advises otherwise.COMMENT The current rule of law regarding ownership of client files is discussed in Donahue v. Vaughn, 721 So.2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), and Dowda & Fields, P.A. v. Cobb, 452 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). A lawyer leaving a law firm, when the law firm r......
-
Enforcement of orders and judgments
...relating to professional services performed for a client are the personal property of the attorney, not the client. [ Donahue v. Vaughn, 721 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rathburn v. Policastro, 703 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (value of retaining lien rests entirely upon lawyer’s right......