O'DONNELL v. Slade
Decision Date | 29 November 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 3372.,3372. |
Parties | O'DONNELL v. SLADE. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania |
Dunsmore & Murphy, of Wellsboro, Pa., for plaintiff.
O'Malley, Hill, Harris & Harris, of Scranton, Pa., for defendant.
The plaintiff instituted this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained as the result of an automobile accident in Bradford county, Pa., under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Statute of 1931, P. L. 50 (75 PS Pa. § 1201 et seq.), which provides as follows: (75 PS Pa. § 1201.)
Suit was instituted in this court on August 3, 1933, by the filing of a statement of claim and a præcipe for summons. A writ of summons was issued by the clerk of the United States District Court and handed to the United States marshal for service. The marshal's return shows that the writ was served by sending a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the statement of claim, to the defendant at his residence in North Tonowanda, N. Y., by registered mail. A return receipt showing that the papers were delivered by the postal authorities to K. N. Slade, as agent for Arthur J. Slade, was attached to the marshal's return. The marshal's return also shows that service of a copy of the same papers was made on the secretary of revenue of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania at his office in the State Capitol at Harrisburg, Pa., and within the middle district of Pennsylvania.
Counsel for the defendant entered a special appearance and filed a petition to quash the summons and dismiss the suit on the ground that the act of the Pennsylvania Assembly does not authorize the service of process issuing out of the United States courts and that the effect of the enforcement of such statute would be to enlarge the jurisdiction of the United States courts. Counsel further contends that such service is not in accordance with any Act of Congress and is not authorized by any law regulating the manner of service of writs of summons in the United States courts. A rule was granted on the petition and argument heard thereon. The constitutionality of the act of the Pennsylvania Assembly is not questioned. This and similar statutes have been declared constitutional. Aversa v. Aubry, 303 Pa. 139, 154 A. 311; Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U. S. 352, 47 S. Ct. 632, 633, 71 L. Ed. 1091. Nor is it alleged that the provisions of the act were not strictly followed in effecting the service of the writ.
The only question is whether this Act of Assembly, authorizing service of process on nonresident defendants who were using the highways of Pennsylvania by serving such nonresident by registered mail and by constituting the secretary of revenue of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania the agent of such nonresident defendants, is to be construed as unlawfully extending the jurisdiction of the federal courts and rendering such service by the United States marshal invalid.
This precise question seems never to have been decided by any courts and no decisions in point can be found.
The Conformity Act, passed by Congress in 1872, 28 USCA § 724, provides that, "The practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding in civil causes, other than equity and admiralty causes, in the district courts, shall conform, as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding existing at the time in like causes in the courts of record of the State within which such district courts are held, any rule of court to the contrary notwithstanding."
Section 112 of title 28 USCA provides in part that "no civil suit shall be brought in any district court against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant; but where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different States, suit shall be brought only in the district of the residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant."
The federal courts have held repeatedly that the right accorded to a defendant by this Act of Congress is a personal privilege which it is competent for him to waive. In re Moore, 209 U. S. 490, 28 S. Ct. 706, 52 L. Ed. 904, 14 Ann. Cas. 1164; Kreigh v. Westinghouse, 214 U. S. 249, 29 S. Ct. 619, 53 L. Ed. 984; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. McBride, 141 U. S. 127, 11 S. Ct. 982, 35 L. Ed. 659.
The courts have also held that "the limitations imposed by Congress as to the place of trial are only for the convenience of the defendant, and do not involve the jurisdiction of the court at all, properly speaking." Lehigh Valley Coal Company v. Yensavage (C. C. A.) 218 F. 547, 549.
This suit is brought in this court on the ground that the parties are citizens of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Knoop v. Anderson
...Review 810. As to the bringing of suits originally in federal court under a state Non-Resident Motorist Service Act, see O'Donnell v. Slade, D.C.Pa.1933, 5 F.Supp. 265. The question of the validity of a statute providing for service on foreign executors and administrators is directly connec......
-
Brown v. Hughes
...274 U.S. 352, at page 356, 47 S.Ct. 632, 71 L.Ed. 1091; Wuchter v. Pizzutti, 276 U.S. 13, 48 S.Ct. 259, 72 L.Ed. 446; O'Donnell v. Slade, D.C.M.D. Pa.1933, 5 F.Supp. 265; Weisler v. Matta, D.C.W.D.Pa.1951, 95 F.Supp. 152, at page 4 And see 49 Harv.L.Rev. 145; 89 U. of P.L.Rev. 238. 5 See Da......
-
Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.
...Harris, 12 Wall. 65, 81, 20 L.Ed. 354; Baltimore & O. Railroad Company v. Koontz, 104 U.S. 5, 10, 26 L.Ed. 643. See, also, O'Donnell v. Slade, D.C.Pa., 5 F.Supp. 265. 6 Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U.S. 369, 24 L.Ed. 853. 7 In re Keasbey & Mattison Co., 160 U.S. 221, 229, 16 S.Ct. 273, 40 L.......
-
Williams v. James
...the actual geographic area of the court having the venue. The cases of De Laet v. Seltzer, D.C., 1932, 1 F.Supp. 1022, O'Donnell v. Slade, D.C., 1933, 5 F.Supp. 265, and Iser v. Brockway, D.C., 1938, 25 F.Supp. 221, are disposed of in the Carby v. Greco case with the notation that service o......