Donovan v. New York Trap Rock Co.
| Decision Date | 16 February 1921 |
| Docket Number | 163. |
| Citation | 271 F. 308 |
| Parties | DONOVAN et al. v. NEW YORK TRAP ROCK CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Foley & Martin, of New York City (James A. Martin and George V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Frederick W. Park, of New York City, for appellee.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
Libelants own a scow, which (with their own master aboard) they chartered to respondent for so much per day for boat and men. Agreement was to return the boat at end of chartered period in good order, reasonable wear and tear excepted; it was returned with an injured bottom.
Charterers sent the scow to a wharf on the Hackensack river, where, in order to lie safely at low tide, such boats as libelants' had to breast off from the wharf with shores; if they did not, the sharply sloping and uneven bottom near the wharf side would inflict injury. Such injury this boat received.
At trial the case became (as was proper under Dailey v. Carroll, 248 F. 466, 160 C.C.A. 476) an inquiry whether the libelants' scow master displayed the reasonable care and skill of his calling in fixing and maintaining these shores. After hearing in open court much contradictory and irreconcilable evidence from eight witnesses, the District Judge held this employee of libelants negligent, and such negligence the proximate cause of disaster.
No litigation has been presented of late more plainly requiring application of the rule laid down from The Albany, 81 Fed.at page 968, 27 C.C.A. 28, to The Bern (C.C.A.) 261 F. 995, to the effect that, where a narrow issue of fact was presented by the oral testimony of men whose mien and bearing justly had weight with the judge who saw them, we will not disturb the result, even though the printed page alone might lead us to a different conclusion.
Decree affirmed, with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.
...Albany, 2 Cir., 81 F. 966, 968 (semble); The A. G. Brower, 2 Cir., 220 F. 648; The F. B. Squire, 2 Cir., 248 F. 469; Donovan v. New York Trap Rock Co., 2 Cir., 271 F. 308; The Perry Setzer, 2 Cir., 299 F. 586; United States Mexican Oil Corporation v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 385......
-
Price v. LONG DOCK CO.
...Derby: Dailey v. Carroll, 2 Cir., 248 F. 466; The Castleton, 2 Cir., 64 F.2d 11; The Trenton, 2 Cir., 72 F.2d 283; Donovan v. New York Trap Rock Corp., 2 Cir., 271 F. 308; The Junior, 2 Cir., 279 F. 407; The Peerless, 282 F. 1000, D.C.S.D.N.Y., affirmed without opinion, 2 Cir., 282 F. 1004;......
-
Johnson v. Cooper
...Albany, 2 Cir., 81 F. 966, 968 (semble); the A. G. Brower, 2 Cir., 220 F. 648; The F. B. Squire, 2 Cir., 248 F. 469; Donovan v. New York Trap Rock Co., 2 Cir., 271 F. 308; The Perry Setzer, 2 Cir., 299 F. 586; United States Mexican Oil Corporation v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 20 F.2d 385......
-
THE RENO
...the value of the trial court's conclusion based as it is usually on an observation of the demeanor of witnesses. Donovan v. N. Y. Trap Rock Co., 271 F. 308 (C. C. A. 2). This rule of law places a serious responsibility upon the trial court. The court may accept the word of one witness over ......