Dorfman v. Dorfman
Decision Date | 23 October 1998 |
Parties | Suzanne DORFMAN (a/k/a Suzanne Polikoff), Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jeffrey DORFMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Suzanne DORFMAN (a/k/a Suzanne Polikoff), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffery DORFMAN, Defendant-Respondent. |
Court | New Jersey Superior Court |
J. Patrick McShane, III, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant-respondent Jeffrey Dorfman (Forkin, McShane, Manos & Rotz, attorneys, Mr. McShane, on the brief).
Eric S. Spevak, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for respondent-appellant Suzanne Dorfman, a/k/a Suzanne Polikoff (Adinolfi and Spevak, attorneys, Mr. Spevak and Sandra Yampell, on the brief).
Before Judges WALLACE, NEWMAN and FALL.
In this consolidated matrimonial matter, both parties appeal an order denying their post-judgment motions. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The parties, both accountants, were married in 1988, separated in 1994, and divorced on February 8, 1995, the final judgment incorporating their detailed property settlement agreement. They have two minor children, Jared and Jason, now eight years old and seven years old, respectively. Custody and parenting-time issues were resolved in accordance with a mediated agreement dated November 14, 1994, incorporated into the property settlement agreement. The mediated agreement provided for a joint custody arrangement with defendant having the following parenting-time:
In addition, major holidays were to be alternated, summer parenting time was provided for, and various information was to be exchanged.
Defendant's weekly support obligation was agreed to be $310 in basic child support; an additional $140 towards the extraordinary expenses of the children such as day care and summer camps; and alimony of $150 for three years, terminating November 30, 1997. This aggregate $600 weekly support obligation was based on the actual $1,227 net weekly income of defendant and the imputed $431 net weekly income of plaintiff. On March 8, 1997, plaintiff remarried and defendant's weekly support obligation automatically reduced to $450. The property settlement agreement contemplates reduction of the weekly $140 extraordinary needs component of support when each child reaches first grade. However, it also provides that Hebrew School costs of the children will be an open issue in the second grade and thereafter. Defendant also agreed to be responsible for 74% of the uninsured health care expenses of the children.
In September 1996 defendant was terminated from his seventeen-year employment with an accounting firm, in which he had a small partnership interest. He also had a small equity interest in the property housing the accounting firm. Defendant secured employment with another accounting firm in October 1996 at a reduced gross annual salary of $60,000. His average gross earnings over the prior five years was approximately $100,000. After discussions with plaintiff, but without her express consent, defendant reduced the $140 weekly extraordinary expenses component of support to $71, reducing his overall weekly payments to $381.
On July 16, 1997 defendant filed a motion, based on changed financial circumstances, to reduce his aggregate support obligation; to reduce his percentage responsibility for unreimbursed health care expenses of the children; to determine he has no responsibility for the costs of Hebrew School; and to receive parenting-time credits under the revised child support guidelines. See R. 5:6A. Plaintiff opposed the motion and filed a cross-motion, seeking discovery of defendant's financial circumstances; payment and enforcement of the full support obligation in the property settlement agreement, with payments through the applicable probation department; contribution towards the Hebrew School expenses; modification of the parenting-time schedule; and counsel fees and costs.
The motion judge denied defendant's application for support and health care expense modification, finding he failed to demonstrate a substantial change of circumstances; required defendant to continue paying the weekly sum of $71 as his extraordinary expenses contribution, inclusive of his obligation towards the Hebrew School costs; denied plaintiff's request for modification of the parenting-time schedule, finding no substantial change in circumstances; and required defendant to pay plaintiff $375 for Jason's counseling. The balance of requested relief was either denied, withdrawn, or mooted by these rulings.
The flaw in imputing an annual gross income of $100,000 to defendant is the lack of a finding by the motion judge that defendant was, without just cause, voluntarily underemployed. Such a finding is requisite, before considering imputation of income. See Bencivenga v. Bencivenga, 254 N.J.Super. 328, 331-32, 603 A.2d 531 (App.Div.1992)
; ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gormley v. Gormley
...is the notion the obligor is intentionally failing to earn that which he or she is capable of earning." Dorfman v. Dorfman, 315 N.J. Super. 511, 516, 719 A.2d 178 (App. Div. 1998)."Imputation of income is a discretionary matter not capable of precise or exact determination but rather requir......
-
Newman v. Newman
...of every support order is the proposition that the payor has the 'ability to pay' the amount set, or agreed to." Dorfman v. Dorfman, 315 N.J. Super. 511, 516 (App. Div. 1998). Support orders may be modified upon a showing of changed circumstances, but a mere reduction in income is not dispo......
-
Curran v. Curran
...resumes, arranged for interviews, sought out placement firms, and carefully considered any offers of employment. Dorfman v. Dorfman, 315 N.J. Super. 511, 516-17 (App. Div. 1998). On the other hand, if a party is self-employed, he or she is in the position to "present an unrealistic picture ......
-
Lin v. Liu
... ... determination that defendant's reduced salary was a ... change in circumstances. See, e.g. , Dorfman v ... Dorfman , 315 N.J.Super. 511, 517 (App. Div. 1998) ... (discussing adequate proffered evidence of job search efforts ... ...