Dorough v. State
Decision Date | 20 May 1941 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 739. |
Citation | 2 So.2d 465,30 Ala.App. 181 |
Parties | DOROUGH v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
V H. Carmichael, of Jasper, for appellant.
Thos S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Noble J. Russell, Asst. Atty Gen., for the State.
This prosecution was begun in the county court wherein this appellant, defendant, was charged with the offense of violating the State prohibition law by unlawfully having in possession prohibited liquors, etc. From a judgment of conviction in the said county court an appeal was taken to the circuit court where the case was tried before a jury upon the original affidavit or complaint. The defendant was again convicted, as charged in the complaint. Judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, and the defendant was sentenced to hard labor for the correct period of time fixed by the Statute. This appeal is from said judgment of conviction.
At the time of the submission of this cause, in this court, the State by and through its representative, the Attorney General, filed a motion to strike the bill of exceptions upon the grounds stated in said motion which is as follows:
Upon examination of the record we find the grounds stated in the foregoing motion to be correct, hence the motion to strike must be, and is, sustained.
The only endorsement entered of record by the trial judge is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Conner v. State
...court. Jefferson Iron & Metal Co. v. Bethune, 263 Ala. 131, 81 So.2d 674; Graham v. State, 30 Ala.App. 179, 2 So.2d 463; Dorough v. State, 30 Ala.App. 181, 2 So.2d 465. "In Seals v. State, 282 Ala. 586, 213 So.2d 645, we said: " 'We do not recede from the position so often stated in our opi......
-
Carden v. State
...court. Jefferson Iron & Metal Co. v. Bethune, 263 Ala. 131, 81 So.2d 674; Graham v. State, 30 Ala.App. 179, 2 So.2d 463; Dorough v. State, 30 Ala.App. 181, 2 So.2d 465. "In Seals v. State, 282 Ala. 586, 213 So.2d 645, we said: " 'We do not recede from the position so often stated in our opi......
-
Lipscomb v. State, 7 Div. 208
...to the appellate courts. Weldon v. State, 21 Ala.App. 357, 108 So. 270; Graham v. State, 30 Ala.App. 179, 2 So.2d 463; Dorough v. State, 30 Ala.App. 181, 2 So.2d 465. This court has held that a party is not entitled as a matter of right, on an application for a rehearing, to a certiorari to......
-
Hayes v. State, 6 Div. 398
...burden of perfecting an appeal is on the appellant, and not on the clerk. Graham v. State, 30 Ala.App. 179, 2 So.2d 463; Dorough v. State, 30 Ala.App. 181, 2 So.2d 465. A failure to observe the procedural requirement of processing an appeal must be borne by the appellant, and cannot be cast......