Dorrance v. Martin

Decision Date08 February 1935
Docket NumberNo. 251.,251.
Citation176 A. 902
PartiesEthel M. DORRANCE, George Morris Dorrance, M. D., Arthur C. Dorrance and Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Company, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of John T. Dorrance, deceased, Prosecutors v. J. H. Thayer MARTIN, State Tax Commissioner of the State of New Jersey, Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

For former opinion, see 116 N. J. Eq. 204, 172 A. 503, supplementing 115 N. J. Eq. 268, 170 A. 601.

See, also, 166 A. 177.

Argued October term, 1934, before TRENCHARD, HEHER, and PERSKIE, JJ.

John Milton, of Jersey City, and Nathan Miller and Harold Otis, both of New York City, for prosecutors.

David T. Wilentz, Atty. Gen., William H. Smathers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Duane E. Minard, of Newark, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari, in this case, brings up for review a final decree of the New Jersey Prerogative Court, dated May 10, 1934, affirming a transfer inheritance tax assessment, made by J. H. Thayer Martin, state tax commissioner of the state of New Jersey, in the matter of the estate of John T. Dorrance, deceased, as made on October 10, 1932, and amounting to $12,247,333.52.

We have carefully studied and considered the voluminous records, proofs, and briefs herein submitted. The opinions of Buchanan, Vice Ordinary, in this matter when it came up before him for determination, are reported in Re Dorrance's Estate, 115 N. J. Eq. 268, 170 A. 601, apd Id., 116 N. J. Eq. 204, 172 A. 503. They disclose a very careful analysis and consideration of the proofs as well as the law applicable thereto; they are comprehensive, clear, sound, and correct.

We are of the firm opinion that there has been nothing further presented to this court which would merit or justify a disturbance of the results reached by the learned Vice Ordinary and with which we are in thorough accord.

Accordingly, the decree brought up for review is sustained and the writ of certiorari is dismissed, with costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • State of Texas v. State of Florida
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 13 Marzo 1939
    ...113 N.J.Eq. 266, 166 A. 177; Id., 115 N.J.Eq. 268, 170 A. 601; Id., 116 N.J.Eq. 204, 172 A. 503, affirmed sub nom., Dorrance v. Thayer-Martin, 176 A. 902, 13 N.J.Misc. 168, affirmed, 116 N.J.L. 362, 184 A. 743, certiorari denied, 298 U.S. 678, 56 S.Ct. 949, 80 L.Ed. 1399; Hill v. Martin, 29......
  • Riley v. Worcester County Trust Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 15 Marzo 1937
    ... ... of domicile was before the Supreme Court on a petition for certiorari to the New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals in the case of Dorrance et al. v. Martin, 298 U.S. 678, 56 S.Ct. 949, 80 L.Ed. 1399, where that court declined to take the case on certiorari. There the tax officials of New ... ...
  • Lyon v. Glaser
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 6 Marzo 1972
    ...337 (App.Div.1951); In re Dorrance, 115 N.J.Eq. 268, 274--275, 170 A. 601 (Prerog.Ct.1934), aff'd Per curiam sub nom. Dorrance v. Thayer-Martin, 13 N.J.Misc. 168, 176 A. 902 (Sup.Ct.1935), aff'd o.b. 116 N.J.L. 362, 184 A. 743 (E. & A.1936); Slater v. Munroe, 313 Mass. 538, 48 N.E.2d 149 (1......
  • Worcester County Trust Co. v. Long, 4292.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 27 Abril 1936
    ...was domiciled in New Jersey. In re Dorrance's Estate, 115 N.J.Eq. 268, 170 A. 601; Id., 116 N.J.Eq. 204, 172 A. 503; Dorrance v. Martin, 176 A. 902, 13 N.J. Misc. 168. See, also, Hill v. Martin, 296 U.S. 393, 56 S.Ct. 278, 80 L.Ed. ___, affirming (D.C.) 12 F.Supp. I can very readily agree w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Domicile, Residence and Citizenship
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 82, 2008
    • Invalid date
    ...In re Dorrance, 115 N.J. Eq. 268, 170 A. 601, 116 N.J. Eq. 204, 172 A. 503 (1934), aff'd sub nom, Dorrance v. Martin, 13 N.J. Misc. 168, 176 A. 902, aff'd, 116 N.J.L. 362, 184 A. 743, cert. denied, 298 U.S. 678 (1936). 35. Hill v. Martin, 296 U.S. 393 (1935). 36. U.S. CONST., Amend. XI. 37.......
  • Conflict of Laws Structure and Vision: Updating a Venerable Discipline
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 31-2, December 2014
    • Invalid date
    ...died domiciled in Pennsylvania); In re Dorrance's Estate, 170 A. 601 (N.J. Prerog. Ct. 1934), aff'd mem., Dorrance v. Thayer Martin, 176 A. 902 (N.J. 1935) (holding John Dorrance died domiciled in New Jersey). These cases provide a lesson against gaming the concept of citizenship and domici......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT