Dorsey v. Oregon Motor Stages

Decision Date23 January 1948
Citation183 Or. 494,194 P.2d 967
CourtOregon Supreme Court

9. Evidence warranted finding that operation of busses between Corvallis and Albany via Camp Adair did not constitute operation of busses on local schedules between Corvallis and Camp Adair within contract forbidding defendant from operating certain busses on local schedules between Corvallis and Camp Adair. O.C.L.A. §§ 2-218, 2-219, 2-222.

War — Government — Requisition property

10. The Government has unfettered power in time of war to requisition property and services essential to the war effort.

War — Purpose of First War Powers Act

11. The purpose of provision of First War Powers Act empowering President to authorize governmental agencies prosecuting the war effort to enter into contract facilitating prosecution of war was to enable subordinates to the President either in his capacity as Chief Executive or in his other capacity as Commander in Chief, to contract freely for all supplies and services needed to facilitate prosecution of war. First War Powers Act of 1941, § 201, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 611.

War — Executive order — First War Powers Act

12. Executive order under First War Powers Act authorizing governmental agencies to enter into contracts for all types and kinds of things and services necessary, appropriate or convenient for prosecution of war authorized lease of United States busses to common carrier of passengers between army camp and nearby cities. First War Powers Act of 1941, §§ 201, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 601, 611; Executive Order No. 9001, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 611 note.

Contracts — Statutory prohibition — Terminates — Contract

13. A statutory or administrative change in law prohibiting further performance of contract terminates contract, notwithstanding that contract contains no provision absolving promisor from performance in such event.

Contracts — Carrier's use of government owned vehicles

14. A motor bus carrier's use of Government owned vehicles to transport passengers between army camp and nearby city was not breach of contract forbidding carrier from using vehicles of third party to carry passengers between camp and city, where Government's insistence that carrier use Government vehicles or stay out of the camp was compulsory though expressed in form of voluntary agreement, notwithstanding that contract contained no provision excusing carrier from promise not to use third party's vehicles. 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 841, subds. 1, 2, 4, 842; First War Powers Act of 1941, §§ 1 et seq., 201, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, §§ 601 et seq., 611; Executive Order No. 9001, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 611 note; Executive Orders Dec. 18, 1941, Jan. 16, 1942, May 2, 1942, Aug. 5, 1942, Sept. 17, 1942, Jan. 4, 1943, Nos. 8989, 9024, 9156, 9214, 9246, 9294.

                  See 137 A.L.R. 1199
                  12 Am. Jur. 960

Appeal from Circuit Court, Benton County.


J.S. Middleton, of Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

John J. Coughlin, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Griffith, Peck, Phillips & Nelson, and C.T. Terrill, of Portland.

Before ROSSMAN, Chief Justice, and LUSK, BELT, KELLY, BAILEY, BRAND and HAY, Justices.

Action for alleged breach of contract by Dean Dorsey against Oregon Motor Stages, an Oregon corporation. From the judgment, the plaintiff appeals.



This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Circuit Court which was entered in an action based upon an alleged breach of a contract signed by the parties June 16, 1942, and amended by a supplementary agreement November 11, 1943.

The appellant presents two assignments of error. The first is:

"The trial court erred in finding and adjudicating that Respondent fully complied with the terms of its contract with Appellant, and that Appellant failed to establish breach thereof."

The second is:

"The trial court erred in finding and decreeing that the use by Respondent of the United States owned busses was required by the military authorities of the United States and that Respondent was compelled to use said busses and that such busses were not busses of third parties within the meaning of the contract and that the use of such busses by Respondent did not constitute a breach of contract."

The appellant was engaged in the business of transporting by motor busses pupils to the high schools in Albany and Corvallis. The respondent was a common carrier of passengers by busses.

Prior to the execution of the contract the United States Army commenced the construction of Camp Adair upon a site a few miles outside of both Albany and Corvallis. The site was not upon a straight line drawn between the two cities, but was accessible to both. When construction of the camp was begun the respondent provided transportation for the camp. The building of the camp gave employment to large numbers of men, and after it was completed tens of thousands of soldiers were stationed there.

The contract upon which this case is predicated recites facts which, when epitomized, are that the transportation demands of the area served by the respondent, as expanded by the transportation needs of the employees in the Portland shipyards and the soldiers and civilians at Camp Adair, render it impossible for the respondent's equipment to serve the needs. The agreement mentions particularly the heavy demands for transportation on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays by the soldiers stationed at Camp Adair. The instrument expresses its purpose as follows:

"The purpose of this agreement, therefore, is to meet the equipment emergency above outlined, to the end that * * *."

Before going on with a further delineation of the provisions of the agreement we pause to state that prior to the construction of Camp Adair the respondent ran no busses into that place. It maintained schedules between Corvallis and Albany, but the busses which served them ran upon a highway which was virtually a straight line. The distance was twelve miles. The roundabout course between Albany and Corvallis through Camp Adair was twenty-one miles.

The parts of the agreement which are germane to the assignments of error required the appellant (1) to apply for a permit authorizing him to operate his school busses between Corvallis and Camp Adair until September 19, 1942, and (2) to discontinue, on September 19, 1942, the operation of his busses between Corvallis and Camp Adair. The same portion of the agreement required the respondent to resume service between the two points just mentioned on September 19, 1942. The only other covenant which needs mention is the very one upon which this cause is based and which we shall now state. Referring to the respondent as Stages and to the appellant by the name of Dorsey, it says:

"* * * Stages agrees that during the life of this agreement it will not lease or use busses of a third party for the operation of local schedules between Corvallis and Camp Adair, except unless at least five (5) of the six (6) busses owned by Dorsey shall at the time be operating under the terms of this lease in the service of Stages."

In short, the respondent bound itself to use the appellant's school busses upon the "local schedules between Corvallis and Camp Adair" to the exclusion of the busses of third parties whenever its own proved inadequate. As we...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Shelter Forest Int'l Acquisition, Inc. v. Cosco Shipping (USA) Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Oregon
    • July 28, 2020
    ...... F.Supp.3d 1171 SHELTER FOREST INTERNATIONAL ACQUISITION, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff, v. COSCO SHIPPING (USA) INC., a Delaware ... Dorsey v. Or. Motor Stages , 183 Or. 494, 503, 194 P.2d 967 (1948). In Dorsey , ......
  • Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • May 17, 1976
    ......denied, 253 U.S. 498, 40 S.Ct. 588, 64 L.Ed. 1032 (1920); Dorsey v. Oregon Motor Stages, 1948, 183 Or. 494, 194 P.2d 967; Tidewater ......
  • Smith Tug & Barge Co. v. Columbia-Pacific Towing Corp.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oregon
    • June 14, 1968
    ......Straub, as . members of the State Land Board of the State of . Oregon, Defendants. . Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. . Argued and Submitted ... FAI-2 Freeway Ramp with our means of access and egress to the motor hotel on Delaware Avenue.' The court found this was a substantial ... If the Corps would not permit this, the lease was futile. In Dorsey v. Oregon Motor Stages, 183 Or. 494, 502--504, 194 P.2d 967 (1948), we ......
  • In re Mr. Movies, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Eighth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Minnesota
    • December 23, 2002
    ......, Debtor and Rentrak were engaged in litigation in state court in Oregon concerning amounts allegedly owing to Rentrak for Debtor's failure to pay ...Fairbanks, Morse & Co., 226 Minn. 1, 31 N.W.2d 920, 925 (1948); Dorsey v. Oregon Motor Stages, 183 Or. 494, 194 P.2d 967, 969 (1948). For any ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT