Dorsey v. United States, 15602.

Decision Date29 June 1964
Docket NumberNo. 15602.,15602.
Citation333 F.2d 1015
PartiesCharles Edward DORSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Charles Edward Dorsey, in pro. per.

William E. Scent, U. S. Atty., John E. Stout, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., on the brief, for appellee.

Before MILLER, PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

Appellant is now incarcerated in the federal penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, pursuant to a conviction and sentence for the unlawful sale and possession of marihuana imposed on October 11, 1962, by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. No appeal has been taken by appellant from his conviction, nor has he filed a motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2255, or a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The present appeal is from an order of the District Court denying appellant a transcript at government expense of the testimony at his trial, "in order to perfect a motion pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C., Section 2255".

A federal prisoner is not entitled under 28 U.S.C. §§ 753(f) and 1915 to obtain such a transcript at government expense for the purpose of preparing a case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Ketcherside v. United States, 317 F.2d 807 (C.A.6).

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Miller v. Hamm
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 22 Julio 1970
    ...8, 10.)2 For federal cases in accord with Sparks, see: Ketcherside v. United States (6th Cir. 1963) 317 F.2d 807; Dorsey v. United States (6th Cir. 1964) 333 F.2d 1015, cert. denied, 379 U.S. 994, 85 S.Ct. 711, 13 L.Ed.2d 613.3 A proceeding can be filed in the superior court against the cle......
  • Bentley v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 2 Septiembre 1970
    ...denial of the transcript under the facts stated above. Ketcherside v. United States, 317 F.2d 807 (6th Cir. 1963); Dorsey v. United States, 333 F.2d 1015 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 994, 85 S.Ct. 711, 13 L.Ed.2d 613 (1965); Mundy v. Henderson, 416 F.2d 432 (6th Cir. 1969). See a......
  • Lucas v. United States, 19807.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 2 Abril 1970
    ...can recall sufficiently the circumstances of a nonfrivolous error to frame an appropriate motion to vacate sentence. Dorsey v. United States, 333 F.2d 1015 (6th Cir. 1964); Ketcherside v. United States, 317 F.2d 807 (6th Cir. Recently, the United States Supreme Court has intimated some depa......
  • United States v. Johnson, CR-05-80025
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 26 Junio 2015
    ...cannot obtain documents under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) for the purpose of preparing a case under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Dorsey v. United States, 333 F.2d 1015, 1015 (6th Cir. 1964). Such documents include trial transcripts and pretrial records. United States v. Lewis, 37 F.3d 1510 (10th Cir. 1994). A ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT