Dotson v. Kander

Docket NumberSC94482
Decision Date30 June 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • Juvenile Officer v. J.L.H. (In re Interest of J.L.H.)
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 8, 2016
    ...schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualification on the commercial sale of arms.”). See also Dotson v. Kander , 464 S.W.3d 190, 198 (Mo. banc 2015) (quoting Heller , 554 U.S. at 626–27, 128 S.Ct. 2783 ). “First Amendment rights are not absolute under all circu......
  • Alpert v. State
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 3, 2018
    ...to bear arms, citing State v. Merritt , 467 S.W.3d 808 (Mo. banc 2015), State v. McCoy , 468 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. banc 2015), and Dotson v. Kander , 464 S.W.3d 190 (Mo. banc 2015). Id. at 533. In upholding section 571.070 as a constitutional restriction against a convicted nonviolent felon’s rig......
  • State v. Merritt
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • August 18, 2015
    ...case because this Court applies the constitution as it was written at the time of the offense. Nevertheless, this Court recently held in Dotson v. Kander that “strict scrutiny would have applied under the Missouri constitution,” regardless of the recent amendment, to constitutional challeng......
  • State v. McCoy
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • August 18, 2015
    ...case because this Court applies the constitution as it was written at the time of the offense. Nevertheless, this Court recently held in Dotson v. Kander that “strict scrutiny would have applied under the Missouri constitution,” regardless of the recent amendment, to constitutional challeng......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The N.R.A.'s Strict-Scrutiny Amendments
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 104-3, March 2019
    • March 1, 2019
    ...An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts , 59 VAND. L. REV. 793, 795 (2006)). 158 . Id. (quoting Dotson v. Kander, 464 S.W.3d 190, 198 (Mo. 2015)). The Missouri Supreme Court deployed the same reasoning in another ruling handed down the same day. See State v. Merritt, ......
  • Indirect Initiative and Unpopular Referendum in Missouri.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 86 No. 2, March 2021
    • March 22, 2021
    ...[section] 2(b). (53.) MO. ANN. STAT. [section] 116.155 (West). (54.) MO. ANN. STAT. [section] 116.190 (West). (55.) Dotson v. Kander, 464 S.W.3d 190, 193 (Mo. 2015) (en banc). (56.) Id. at 193 (citing Buchanan v. Kirkpatrick, 615 S.W.2d 6, 11-12 (Mo. 1981) (en banc). (57.) Id. at 193-94. (5......