Doucet v. Travelers Insurance Company

Decision Date10 June 1966
Docket NumberNo. 22794.,22794.
Citation362 F.2d 263
PartiesMary U. DOUCET and Semar Doucet, Appellants, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and A. W. Dunn, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Veil David DeVillier, Robert K. Guillory, Aaron Frank McGhee, Eunice, La., for appellants.

James T. Guglielmo, Dubuisson & Dubuisson, Opelousas, La., for Travelers Ins. Co. and A. W. Dunn.

John M. Shaw, Lewis & Lewis, Opelousas, La., for Home Indemnity Co.

Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The appellants are appealing from an adverse judgment entered on their separate claims for damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between their automobile and a truck on U. S. Highway 71 in Louisiana. The passenger's suit against his driver's insurance carrier was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the policy limits were under $10,000.00. The jury found against the driver in her action.

We have carefully examined all questions presented by each of the appellants, and conclude that the record shows no reversible error.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Carpenter v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • October 9, 1981
    ...when an insurer's policy limits are less than the jurisdictional amount, there is no diversity jurisdiction. Doucet v. Traveler's Insurance Co., 362 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1966). Heavner v. State Automobile Insurance Co. of Columbus, 340 F.Supp. 391 (W.D.Va.1972); Mizukami v. Buras, 419 F.2d 13......
  • Novosel v. Northway Motor Car Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • October 24, 1978
    ...standard is clearly applicable in those cases where recovery is limited by the terms of a contract, e. g., Doucet v. Travelers Insurance Co., 362 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1966); where the governing law places limits upon the damages recoverable, James v. Lusby, 162 U.S.App. D.C. 352, 499 F.2d 488......
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Brown
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • April 24, 1990
    ...of coverage, the court can determine the amount in controversy by reference to the face of the policy. See, e.g., Doucet v. Travelers Ins. Co., 362 F.2d 263 (5th Cir.1966); Carpenter v. Illinois Centr. Gulf R. Co., 524 F.Supp. 249, 253 (M.D.La.1981); Heavner, 340 F.Supp. at 393. This case i......
  • Commercial Union Ins. V. Sea Harvest Seafood Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • June 11, 2001
    ... ... 251 F.3d 1294 (10th Cir. 2001) ... COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, ... SEA HARVEST SEAFOOD COMPANY, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT