Doughty v. Maxwell, 516

Citation83 S.Ct. 1106,10 L.Ed.2d 139,372 U.S. 781
Decision Date22 April 1963
Docket NumberNo. 516,M,516
PartiesMarvin DOUGHTY v. E. L. MAXWELL. isc
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

Doughty, pro se.

Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, and James E. Rattan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • State v. Laskey
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1970
    ...for reconsideration in the light of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799. Doughty v. Maxwell (1963) 372 U.S. 781, 83 S.Ct. 1106, 10 L.Ed.2d 139. This court adhered to its original judgment, Doughty v. Sacks (1963), 175 Ohio St. 46, 191 N.E.2d 727, and was r......
  • Abercrombie v. State
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1967
    ...be the same if the case had been decided after Gideon v. Wainwright, supra. See Doughty v. Maxwell, 372 U.S. 781, 83 S.Ct. 1106, 10 L.Ed.2d 139 (1963), 376 U.S. 202, 84 S.Ct. 702, 11 L.Ed.2d 650 (1964). In State v. Thurlow, 85 Idaho 96, 375 P.2d 996 (1962), an arraignment almost identical t......
  • United States v. LaVallee
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • March 26, 1964
    ...to have left the issue open, our conclusion seems plainly required by the Supreme Court's recent disposition of Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. 202, 84 S.Ct. 702, 11 L.Ed.2d 650. Doughty had been indicted for rape in 1958. Although "discussing" the possibility of securing counsel with his wife......
  • Pharris v. State
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1967
    ...apply in capital cases). The doctrine discussed in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra, is held to apply retroactively. Doughty v. Maxwell, 372 U.S. 781, 83 S.Ct. 1106, 10 L.Ed.2d 139 and 376 U.S. 202, 84 S.Ct. 702, 11 L.Ed.2d 650; Berryhill v. Page, 349 F.2d 984 (10th Cir. 1965); Commonwealth ex r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT