Dover v. Harrell

Decision Date31 January 1877
CitationDover v. Harrell, 58 Ga. 572 (Ga. 1877)
PartiesH. S. Dover et al., plaintiffs in err0r. v. David Harrell, executor, defendant in error.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Attorney and Client. Witness. Production of Papers. Evidence. Before Judge McCutchen. Gordon Superior Court. March Term, 1876.

This was ejectment by Harrell, as executor of Jesse Harrell, against Dover et al., for a lot of land in Gordon county. In the course of the trial, counsel for plaintiff asked permission of the court to examine Reuben Arnold, Esq., of counsel for defendants, as to what papers or deeds he had in his possession. Mr. Arnold objected to such examination, and claimed the protection of the privilege which the relation of attorney and client created. The court ordered that the examination proceed.

Mr, Arnold then stated that his client had confided to him certain papers from which to prepare his defense, amongst which was the original grant to the lot in dispute, conveying the same to the plaintiff's testator.

The court, on motion, ordered that he produce this paper and deliver it to plaintiff's counsel. The order was complied with, and the grant introduced in evidence by the plaintiff.

To this entire proceeding defendants excepted.

A verdict was returned for the plaintiff. The defendants moved for a new trial, basing their motion, among other grounds, upon the above exception.

The motion was overruled, and the case brought here for review.

Arnold & Arnold; W. S. Johnson, for plaintiffs in error.

J. A. W. Johnson, by A. Johnson, for defendant.

*Bleckley, Judge.

L Under sections 3798 and 3854 of the Code, the attorney of one of the parties in the case on trial, is protected from being coerced by the court to disclose, on oath, that he has in his possession a grant from the state covering the land in dispute, and from producing the grant to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Southern Guar. Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Ash
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 1989
    ...of counsel are conferred for the benefit of clients and are sacred." (Emphasis supplied.) 2 EGL, Attorney & Client, § 52, citing Dover v. Harrell, 58 Ga. 572. In 1887, the Supreme Court in Fire Assn. of Philadelphia v. Fleming, 78 Ga. 733(3), 3 S.E. 420, held that "[l]etters written between......
  • Goodman v. Henderson
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1877
  • Trustees of Chester Church v. Blount
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 18, 1883
    ...should have replied to the question as to his possession of the deed, and if he had it, should have been directed to produce it. In Dover vs. Harrell, the grant the counsel was forced to produce was a title paper of the client which had been entrusted to the counsel " to prepare his defence......