Dowd v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
Decision Date | 04 December 1961 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 84485. |
Citation | 37 T.C. 399 |
Parties | LAURENCE P. DOWD AND JULIET R. DOWD, PETITIONERS, V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. |
Court | U.S. Tax Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Laurence P. Dowd, for the petitioners.
Cyrus A. Johnson, Esq., for the respondent.
Petitioner was in Japan from October of 1955 until July of 1957 as a Fulbright lecturer at Kobe University. He was paid in inconvertible Japanese currency by the United States Educational Commission in Japan. Held:
1. Amounts paid to petitioner in 1956 and 1957 as a Fulbright lecturer were ‘paid by the United States or an agency thereof’ within the meaning of section 911(a)(2) of the 1954 Code and thus were not excludible from gross income.
2. Petitioner's tax residence remained in the United States during 1956 and 1957. As a Fulbright lecturer in Japan, petitioner was temporarily ‘away from home’ in the pursuit of his trade or profession of teaching and was entitled to deduct his traveling expenses under section 162(a)(2) of the 1954 Code. Amount of such expenses in 1956 and 1957 determined.
Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' income tax in the amounts of $863.11 in 1956 and $801.86 in 1957.
The principal issue is whether payments made to petitioner Laurence P. Dowd as a Fulbright lecturer in 1956 and 1957 by the United States Educational Commission in Japan were ‘amounts paid by the United States or an agency thereof’ and therefore not excludible from gross income under section 911(a)(2) of the 1954 Code. If such payments are includible in gross income, an alternative question is whether petitioner while a Fulbright lecturer in Japan was ‘away from home’ within the meaning of section 162(a)(2) of the 1954 Code and thereby entitled to deduct his ‘traveling expenses' while in Japan.
The facts stipulated by the parties are incorporated herein by this reference.
Petitioners, husband and wife, filed joint income tax returns for the taxable year 1956 with the district director of internal revenue at Tacoma, Washington, and for the taxable year 1957 with the district director of internal revenue at Detroit, Michigan. Juliet R. Dowd is a petitioner herein only because joint returns were filed. Laurence P. Dowd will hereinafter be referred to as petitioner.
Prior to September 1955 petitioner was employed by the University of Washington at Seattle, Washington, as an assistant professor of Marketing, Transportation and Foreign Trade. In September 1955 petitioner was promoted to the rank of associate professor. He was granted a sabbatical leave from the university for the academic year 1955-1956.
On March 5, 1955, petitioner was awarded a Fulbright grant for the purpose of lecturing in economics at Kobe University, Kobe, Japan, for a 10-month period beginning in October 1955. The notice which officially informed petitioner of the award was a Department of State form entitled a ‘United States Government Grant Authorization’ with attached ‘Terms and Conditions of U.S. Government Grant.’ The grant authorization named the United States Educational Commission in Japan as the ‘administering U.S. educational foundation or commission’ of the award. It provided a ‘maintenance allowance’ for petitioner and four accompanying dependents amounting to 3,096,000 yen. During 1956 and 1957 the rate of exchange was 360 Japanese yen for 1 United States dollar.
Among the ‘Terms and Conditions of U.S. Government Grant’ which petitioner agreed to in accepting the award were the following:
The Foundation may in its discretion at the request of the grantee extend the grant for a period not to exceed three months at the pro rata monthly rate of the allowance in order to permit the grantee to complete his activity.
The so-called Fulbright Act (Pub. L. 584, 79th Cong., 2d Sess., 60 Stat. 754) is an amendment to the Surplus Property Act of 1944 and provides in part that in carrying out the provisions of the latter statute the Secretary of State is authorized to enter into executive agreements with any foreign government ‘for the use of currencies, or credits for currencies, of such government acquired as a result of such surplus property disposals,‘ for the purpose of providing, by the formation of foundations or otherwise, for financing studies, research, instruction, and other education activities of or for American citizens in schools or institutions of higher learning located in such foreign country or of citizens in such foreign country in American schools and institutions of higher learning.
Pursuant to the provisions of the foregoing legislation, the United States Educational Commission in Japan was established by an agreement between the United States and Japan on August 28, 1951. This agreement provided in part as follows:
There shall be established a Commission to be known as the United States Educational Commission in Japan (hereinafter designated ‘the Commission’), which shall be recognized by the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Japan as an organization created and established to facilitate the administration of an educational program financed by funds to be made available by the Government of Japan for surplus property sold to it by the Government of the United States of America. Except as provided herein the Commission shall be exempt from the domestic and local laws of the United States of America as they relate to the use and expenditure of currencies and credits for currencies for the purpose set forth herein. The funds and property shall be regarded in Japan as property of a foreign government.
In furtherance of the aforementioned purposes, the Commission may, subject to the provisions of the present memorandum exercise all powers necessary to the carrying out of the purpose of this memorandum including the following:
(4) Authorize the Treasurer of the Commission or such other person as the Commission may designate to receive funds to be deposited in bank accounts in the name of the Treasurer of the Commission or such other person as may be designated. The appointment of the Treasurer or such designee shall be approved by the Secretary of State and he shall deposit funds received in a depository or depositories designated by the Secretary of State of the United States of America.
(6) Provide for periodic audits of the accounts of the Treasurer of the Commission as directed by auditors selected by the Secretary of State of the United States of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...it is true that the application of section 911(a) does not necessarily turn on an employer/employee relationship (see Dowd v. Commissioner, 37 T.C. 399, 406 (1961); Sverdrup v. Commissioner, 14 T.C. 859, 865 (1950)), it is also true that when there is such a relationship, one's salary usual......
-
Michel v. C. I. R., 77-3422
...home". Peurifoy v. Commissioner, 358 U.S. 59, 60-61, 79 S.Ct. 104, 105, 3 L.Ed.2d 30; Michaels v. Commissioner, 53 T.C. 269; Dowd v. Commissioner, 37 T.C. 399. A taxpayer who accepts permanent or indefinite employment in a location different from that of his residence, however, is considere......
-
Michel v. Commissioner, Docket No. 10420-75.
...home". Peurifoy v. Commissioner 58-2 USTC ¶ 9925, 358 U.S. 59, 60-61; Michaels v. Commissioner Dec. 29,836, 53 T.C. 269; Dowd v. Commissioner Dec. 25,158, 37 T.C. 399. A taxpayer who accepts permanent or indefinite employment in a location different from that of his residence, however, is c......
-
Soboleski v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...foreign or domestic. See Erlandson v. Commissioner, 277 F.2d 70 (9th Cir. 1960), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; Dowd v. Commissioner, 37 T.C. 399 (1961); Teskey v. Commissioner, 30 T.C. 456 (1958). For example, in Wolfe v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 572 (1965), revd. 361 F.2d 62 (D.C.......