Downey v. Day

Decision Date21 December 1853
PartiesDowney v. Day
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

ERROR to the Randolph Circuit Court.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded.

D. Kilgore, for the plaintiff.

W. A. Peelle and T. J. Sample, for the defendant.

OPINION

Roache, J.

Day brought an action of trespass for an assault and battery against Downey. Plea, son assault demesne. Replication, de injuria, &c. Issue joined, trial, verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below.

The plaintiff in error complains of the giving of certain instructions to the jury at the request of the plaintiff. The evidence is not set out. The instructions were all correct, if a state of proof existed to which they were applicable. In the absence of the testimony, we must presume they were pertinent.

On the trial the defendant below claimed the right to begin and close the evidence and argument to the jury. Over his objection, the Court permitted the plaintiff to open and close. The defendant excepted. This was erroneous. The state of the issue threw the affirmative on the defendant, and entitled him to the beginning and conclusion. 2 Stark. Ev. 826.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • McCloskey v. Davis
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • November 1, 1893
    ...v. Rich, 2 Ind. App. 540, 28 N. E. Rep. 1001; Stames v. Schofield, 5 Ind. App. 4, 31 N. E. Rep. 480; Kimble v. Adair, 2 Blackf. 320;Downey v. Day, 4 Ind. 531;Moore v. Allen, 5 Ind. 521;Shank v. Fleming, 9 Ind. 189;McLees v. Felt, 11 Ind. 218;Judah v. Trustees, 23 Ind. 272;Goodrich v. Friede......
  • McCloskey v. Davis
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • November 1, 1893
    ...533; Donahoe v. Rich, 2 Ind.App. 540, 28 N.E. 1001; Starnes v. Schofield, 5 Ind.App. 4; Kimble, Assignee, v. Adair, 2 Blackf. 320; Downey v. Day, 4 Ind. 531; Moore v. Allen, 5 Ind. 521; Shank v. Fleming, 9 Ind. 189; McLees v. Felt, 11 Ind. 218; Judah v. Trustees of Vincennes University, 23 ......
  • Salt Springs Nat. Bank v. Schlosser
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 25, 1930
    ...that in case of a jury trial the right to open and close is a substantial right, the denial of which constitutes reversible error. Downey v. Day, 4 Ind. 531;Howard v. Cobb, 6 Ind. 5;Haines v. Kent, 11 Ind. 126;Ashing v. Miles, 16 Ind. 329;Judah v. Vincennes University, 23 Ind. 273;Cox v. Vi......
  • Salt Springs National Bank v. Schlosser
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • April 25, 1930
    ...in case of a jury trial, the right to open and close is a substantial right, the denial of which constitutes reversible error. Downey v. Day (1853), 4 Ind. 531; Howard v. Cobb (1854), 6 Ind. Haines v. Kent (1858), 11 Ind. 126; Ashing v. Miles (1861), 16 Ind. 329; Judah v. Trustees of Vincen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT