Doyle v. Chase Manhattan Bank

CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
CitationDoyle v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 193 A.2d 141, 40 N.J. 508 (N.J. 1963)
Decision Date01 July 1963
PartiesRachel Armour DOYLE, Plaintiff, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, etc., et al., Defendants. Ruth Armour KAMEN, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, etc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Milton, Keane & DeBona, Jersey City, for petitioner.

Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, Newark, for respondents.

Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Commission
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • July 26, 1977
    ..."newly discovered evidence." See Doyle v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 80 N.J.Super. 105, 125, 193 A.2d 151 (App.Div.), certif. den. 40 N.J. 508, 193 A.2d 141 (1963) (R. 4:50-1); Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193, 71 S.Ct. 209, 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950) (F.R. 60(b)). We are convinced that the cir......
  • City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • May 21, 1986
    ...395-398, 471 A.2d 395 (1984); Doyle v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 80 N.J.Super. 105, 125, 193 A.2d 151 (App.Div.1963), certif. den. 40 N.J. 508, 193 A.2d 141 (1963); In re Estate of Wehrhane, 149 N.J.Super. 41, 54, 372 A.2d 1365 (Ch.Div.1977). We view the situation here as such an exceptional ci......
  • Johnson v. Cyklop Strapping Corp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • October 6, 1987
    ...in fact so limited, see, e.g., Doyle v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 80 N.J.Super. 105, 124, 193 A.2d 151 (App.Div.1963), certif. den. 40 N.J. 508, 193 A.2d 141 (1963), this court in Quagliato v. Bodner, 115 N.J.Super. 133, 137, 278 A.2d 500 (App.Div.1971), without citation of authority, reasoned ......
  • Bauer v. Griffin
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • February 14, 1969
    ...specified in subsection (a) (Doyle v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 80 N.J.Super. 105, 193 A.2d 151 (App.Div.1963), certification denied 40 N.J. 508, 193 A.2d 141 (1963)), it is conceivable that mistake, other than trial error, might be sufficiently egregious in any given case so as to qualify as a......
  • Get Started for Free