Drainage Com'rs of Dist. No. 1 v. Village of Cerro Gordo
| Decision Date | 24 October 1905 |
| Citation | Drainage Com'rs of Dist. No. 1 v. Village of Cerro Gordo, 217 Ill. 488, 75 N.E. 516 (Ill. 1905) |
| Parties | DRAINAGE COM'RS OF DIST. NO. 1 v. VILLAGE OF CERRO GORDO. |
| Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to Circuit Court, Piatt County; Solon Philbrick, Judge.
Action by the drainage commissioners of district No. 1 against the village of Cerro Gordo. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.Ray, Dobbins & Riley and James L. Hicks, for plaintiff in error.
Reed & Reed and A. C. Edie, for defendant in error.
This is a writ of error to reverse the judgment entered in the Piatt circuit court, sustaining a demurrer to a declaration filed by the drainage district against the village in an action of debt and dismissing the action. The declaration alleged that the drainage district was duly organized under the act of the General Assembly approved June 27, 1885, commonly known as the ‘Farm Drainage Act’; that the village was situate adjacent to the district, and was possessed of and in the control of certain streets and alleys therein, and on the 1st day of April, 1904, the authorities of the village connected the drains, ditches, and tiles draining a part of the streets and alleys, with the ditches, drains, and tiles of the drainage district, and thereby acquired and still have the drainage of said streets and alleys by and through the ditches of the said drainage district; that on the 2d day of July, 1904, the drainage commissioners of said district duly entered an order attaching all that part of the streets and alleys of the village to said drainage district which had been drained into the ditches and tiles of the said drainage district by and with and through the ditches and tiles and drains laid and connected by the said village, and made the same a part of the said drainage district, and classified the said streets and alleys the same as if they had been included in said district as originally organized, at one-fifteenth of the four original assessments levied upon the lands and property of said drainage district for the construction of the drains and ditches of said drainage district, and gave notice, as required by law, to the officers of said village, of the time when and the place where the said commissioners of said drainage district would meet to hear objections to said classification of the streets and alleys of the said village; that at the time and place mentioned in said notice the commissioners of said drainage district duly met to hear all objections which might be urged by the said village to the said classification aforesaid; that the said village, by its officers, appeared at the time and place mentioned for hearing of the objections to said classification, and objected thereto on the grounds that the village should not pay one-fifteenth of the four original levies levied upon said drainage district, and that said classification should be made against the lots along said portion of said streets and alleys so attached to said drainage district No. 1, and not against the said village, and made no other or further objection to said classification; that said commissioners, having heard all objections made by said village and having duly considered the same, did affirm the said classification as originally made and filed by said commissioners, and filed their said confirmed classification as required by law; that on the 13th day of July, 1904, the said commissioners filed an assessment roll, and assessed against said village, for benefits received by that part of the streets and alleys of said village so attached to said drainage district, the sum of $976.66, the same being assessed in conformation with the classification so above made and confirmed, and being the one-fifteenth part of the four levies made by the said drainage district for the construction of the system of ditches, tiles, and drains in said drainage district; that the said assessment, being so filed, then and there became a debt due and owing by the said village to the said drainage district; that the same remains wholly due and unpaid and in no manner appealed from or set aside; that after making said classification and hearing the objections so made by said village to said classification, and after the said commissioners of said drainage district had confirmed said classification, the said village failed to appeal therefrom, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Spring Creek Drainage Dist. v. Elgin, J.&E. Ry. Co.
...v. Spring Creek Drainage District, 222 Ill. 441, 78 N. E. 836, wherein it was held, upon the authority of Drainage Com'rs v. Village of Cerro Gordo, 217 Ill. 488, 75 N. E. 516, that section 55 of the levee act (Laws 1885, p. 132), as it existed prior to the amendment of May 29, 1909 (Laws 1......
-
City of Joliet v. Spring Creek Drainage Dist.
...levy and collection of road and bridge taxes and the amount required to liquidate road and ditch damages. In Drainage Com'rs v. Village of Cerro Gordo, 217 Ill. 488, 75 N. E. 516, the commissioners of the drainage district, which was organized under the farm drainage act, made an order atta......
-
Drainage District No. 19 of Dunklin County v. Arcadia Timber Co.
... ... appellant ... (1) The ... petition states a cause of action ... Castor, 87 Ind ... 244; Drain. Dist. v. Harris, 267 Mo. 148; Drain ... Dist. v. lage of Cerro Gordo, 217 Ill. 488. (e) The ... theory of ... ...
-
Hewes v. Chicago & E.I.R. Co.
... ... the depot, between the tracks, a cattle guard 4 1/2 or 5 feet high, in the form of an inverted ... ...