Drainage Dist. No. 119, Clay County v. Incorporated City of Spencer, 119
Citation | 268 N.W.2d 493 |
Decision Date | 28 June 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 60839,A,No. 119,119,60839 |
Parties | DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 119, CLAY COUNTY, Iowa, and the Board of Supervisors of Clay County, acting on behalf of said Drainage Districtppellant, v. The INCORPORATED CITY OF SPENCER, Iowa, and the Iowa Department of Transportation, Appellees. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Iowa |
Greer, Hoover, Nelson, Montgomery & Barry, Spencer, for appellant.
Mack, Hansen & Gadd, Storm Lake, for appellee City of Spencer.
Asher E. Schroeder, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Ames, for appellee Iowa Dept. of Transp.
Considered by MOORE, C. J., and MASON, * RAWLINGS, UHLENHOPP and REYNOLDSON, JJ.
MASON, Justice (Serving by special assignment).
Plaintiff, Drainage District No. 119 of Clay County and the Board of Supervisors of Clay County acting on behalf of said Drainage District No. 119, appeals from the trial court's ruling sustaining defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground plaintiff was not entitled to any relief as a matter of law.
Plaintiff instituted an action seeking declaratory relief against the City of Spencer (City) and the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT). Plaintiff had alleged that defendants had each refused to pay the assessments incurred for the construction of a culvert crossing at Fourth Avenue West in the vicinity of 30th Street North and a culvert crossing at North Grand Avenue, also known as U.S. Highways 18 and 71, all within the city limits of Spencer and for the area assessments incurred at these crossings.
Plaintiff asked the court to determine the obligations and duties of the City and DOT to pay for the construction of the culvert crossings and area assessments.
After plaintiff's petition, defendants' answers, and plaintiff's amendment to its petition and reply to defendants' answers had been filed, the parties entered into a stipulation of facts which plaintiff attached to its motion for summary judgment. Prior to entry of a ruling on this motion the parties amended the stipulation. After the motion was dismissed by Judge Andreasen, defendants filed motion for summary judgment. Judge Underwood sustained the motion and dismissed plaintiff's petition. Plaintiff's appeal is from Judge Underwood's sustention of the motion and dismissal of its petition.
The underlying facts here are included in the stipulation entered into by the parties. This stipulation was as follows:
The total cost of construction of said culverts and area assessments all located in Drainage District No. 119 is $27,582.53.
The amendment to the stipulation added the following:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Slaughter v. Des Moines Univ. Coll. of Osteopathic Med.
...on other grounds as stated in Higgins v. Mississippi , 217 F.3d 951, 954 (7th Cir. 2000) ; see also Drainage Dist. No. 119 v. Incorporated City of Spencer , 268 N.W.2d 493, 499 (Iowa 1978) ("The purpose of summary judgment is to enable a judgment to be obtained promptly and without the expe......
-
Midwest Management Corp. v. Stephens
...deciding whether defendants met their burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Drainage District No. 119 v. City of Spencer, 268 N.W.2d 493, 499 (Iowa 1978). II. Iowa blue sky law. The first ground on which the court sustained defendants' motions was that the stock......
-
Bates v. Allied Mut. Ins. Co.
...and without the expense of a trial when there is no genuine and material fact issue present." Drainage Dist. No. 119 v. Incorporated City of Spencer, 268 N.W.2d 493, 499 (Iowa 1978). The moving party must demonstrate both the absence of any such issue, and that he is entitled to judgment as......
-
Parsons v. National Dairy Cattle Congress
...Brody v. Ruby, 267 N.W.2d 902, 904 (Iowa 1978). On review we are guided by the same principles. See Drainage District No. 119 v. Incorporated City of Spencer, 268 N.W.2d 493, 500 (Iowa 1978). II. By their answers and summary judgment motions defendants based their assumption of risk and con......