Dranko v. Dranko
Citation | 824 A.2d 1215 |
Parties | Danielle DRANKO, Appellant, v. Bryan Andrew DRANKO, Appellee. |
Decision Date | 15 May 2003 |
Court | Superior Court of Pennsylvania |
John J. Elash, McKeesport, for appellant.
Jean M, Lupariello, Carnegie, for appellee.
¶ 1 Danielle Dranko (Mother) appeals from an order denying her petition for relocation and dismissing Bryan Andrew Dranko's (Father) petition for primary custody of the parties' two children. Mother contends that the court failed to consider an alternative visitation schedule in the context of a relocation case and erred in concluding that the proposed move would not improve the children's quality of life. We affirm.
¶ 2 This matter came before the trial court as a result of the parties' respective petitions. Subsequent to a hearing held on July 24, 2002, the trial court formulated the following findings of fact:
5. Mr. Wayne Frazier has previously been married and has two (2) children living in and about the Valdosta, Georgia area for whom he is financially responsible for child support and alimony to his ex-spouse, though this alimony responsibility is very close to termination. In addition, he has two (2) brothers in and about that metropolitan area. Mr. Frazier is a cabinetmaker and installer and testified that it would not be feasible for him to relocate his business to the Pittsburgh area and have any reasonable expectation of continuing his business at the level it presently enjoys.
10. Paternal grandfather and his wife of approximately eight (8) years, have also spent a considerable period of time involved in the lives of the minor children, especially since the parties separated.
Trial Court's Findings of Fact (FOF), 7/31/02, at 1-5. Based on these findings, the court denied Mother's relocation petition and dismissed Father's petition for primary custody. Trial Court Order, 7/31/02.
¶ 3 Mother now appeals to this Court, and raises the following issues for our review:
1. Is the court required to attempt to fashion an alternate visitation arrangement that will serve to foster an ongoing relationship between the children and the non-custodial parent in a relocation case?
2. Did the Court abuse its discretion in determining that the benefits associated with the proposed move testified to at the time of trial were not likely to improve the quality of life of the children?
Mother's brief at 14.
¶ 4 Initially, we note that this Court in Graham v. Graham, 794 A.2d 912 (Pa.Super.2002), set forth the following to guide our review of a custody order:
In reviewing custody matters, this court has stated that our scope of review is very broad. Nonetheless, a broad scope of review should not be construed as providing the reviewing tribunal with a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johns v. Cioci
...type and our standard is abuse of discretion. McMillen v. McMillen, 529 Pa. 198, 202, 602 A.2d 845, 847 (1992); Dranko v. Dranko, 824 A.2d 1215, 1219 (Pa. Super. 2003). This Court must accept findings of the trial court that are supported by competent evidence of record, as our role does no......
-
Fox v. Garzilli
...the proceedings and thus viewed the witnesses first hand. Jackson v. Beck, 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa.Super.2004); Dranko [v. Dranko, 824 A.2d 1215 (Pa.Super.2003),] at 1219 (citing Robinson v. Robinson, 538 Pa. 52, 57, 645 A.2d 836, 838 (1994)); Andrews v. Andrews, 411 Pa.Super. 286, 601 A.2d......
-
K.T. v. L.S.
...unreasonable as shown by the evidence of record.’ ” Ketterer v. Seifert, 902 A.2d 533, 539 (Pa.Super.2006) (quoting Dranko v. Dranko, 824 A.2d 1215, 1219 (Pa.Super.2003) ). The statutory presumption favoring an award of custody to parents over third-parties is not applicable to the current ......
-
Fox v. Garzilli, 2005 PA Super 175 (PA 5/13/2005)
...the proceedings and thus viewed the witnesses first hand. Jackson v. Beck, 858 A.2d 1250, 1254 (Pa.Super. 2004); Dranko [v. Dranko, 824 A.2d 1215 (Pa.Super. 2003),] at 1219 (citing Robinson v. Robinson, 538 Pa. 52, 57, 645 A.2d 836, 838 (1994)); Andrews v. Andrews, 601 A.2d 352, 353 (Pa.Sup......