Draper v. Rosario

Docket Number14-16340
Decision Date07 September 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
244 cases
  • Tan Lam v. City of L. Banos
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 25 September 2020
    ...that it affects the party's substantial rights such that review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice. Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 1085 (9th Cir. 2016). An error creates a miscarriage of justice if it "seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of jud......
  • Bearchild v. Cobban
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 16 January 2020
    ...district court’s ... instruction was impermissible." Hoard v. Hartman , 904 F.3d 780, 790 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 1086 (9th Cir. 2016) ). A jury instruction that "adds an obviously non-existent element to the plaintiff’s burden of proof" is plainly errone......
  • Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. Cosmetic Warriors Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 29 June 2018
    ...this evidentiary ruling on appeal. "We review the district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion." Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 1080 (9th Cir. 2016).Evidence of the LUSH mark in Canada was not relevant to the infringement-related questions for which the jury was the sole......
  • Williams v. Gaye
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 21 March 2018
    ...in Apportioning Costs Among the Parties. We review the district court's award of costs for abuse of discretion. Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 1087 (9th Cir. 2016). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) authorizes the award of costs "to the prevailing party." A "party in whose favor ......
  • Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
  • Hearsay Rule
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Is It Admissible? - 2017 Testimonial evidence
    • 31 July 2017
    ...court must make adequate findings on the record before admitting hearsay statements under the residual exception. Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 95 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1224, 101 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 442 (9th Cir., 2016). In a prisoner’s §1983 action asserting an Eighth Amendment excessive forc......
  • Hearsay Rule
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Is It Admissible? - 2021 Testimonial evidence
    • 2 August 2021
    ...court must make adequate indings on the record before admitting hearsay statements under the residual exception. Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 95 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1224, 101 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 442 (9th Cir., 2016). In a prisoner’s §1983 action asserting an Eighth Amendment excessive force......
  • Hearsay rule
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Is It Admissible? Part I. Testimonial Evidence
    • 1 May 2022
    ...court must make adequate findings on the record before admitting hearsay statements under the residual exception. Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 95 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1224, 101 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 442 (9th Cir., 2016). In a prisoner’s §1983 action asserting an Eighth Amendment excessive forc......
  • Hearsay Rule
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Is It Admissible? - 2020 Testimonial evidence
    • 2 August 2020
    ...court must make adequate indings on the record before admitting hearsay statements under the residual exception. Draper v. Rosario , 836 F.3d 1072, 95 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1224, 101 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 442 (9th Cir., 2016). In a prisoner’s §1983 action asserting an Eighth Amendment excessive force......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT