Dreamland Ball Room v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co.
| Decision Date | 11 December 1929 |
| Docket Number | No. 4156-4158.,4156-4158. |
| Citation | 36 F.2d 354 |
| Parties | DREAMLAND BALL ROOM, Inc., et al. v. SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO. SAME v. LEO FIEST, Inc., SARGENT v. AGER, YELLEN & BORNSTEIN, Inc. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Phelps F. Darby, of Evansville, Ind., for appellants.
E. S. Hartman, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
Because the questions presented are identical, all three appeals will be disposed of in one opinion. Each decree appealed from enjoined one group of appellants from publicly performing "a certain musical composition" in their dance hall, and awarded appellee $250 damages and costs, and $100 attorneys' fees. In each suit the aforesaid musical composition was copyrighted, and the copyright owned or controlled by the party bringing the suit.
Appellants owned, or operated for profit, or directed the operation of, a dance or amusement hall to which the public was invited for entertainment, and for which a charge was made. An orchestra furnished music, and at times played one or more of the copyrighted compositions without the consent of appellee. Infringement by the orchestra is conceded.
Appellants assign error, because: (a) Any relief was granted appellee; (b) the damages are excessive.
(a) An orchestra of several persons was engaged, through a contract with its leader, to furnish music (from 8:30 to 11:30 p. m.) on certain nights for $37 per night. Appellants assert they had no voice in the selection of the musicians and had no control over the players, nor did they, nor could they, determine the musical selections to be rendered during an evening's engagement. They did not direct the playing of any selection, and did not know that any musical selection played by the orchestra was copyrighted. Neither did they know the orchestra was without consent from appellees to play the copyrighted musical selections "Mississippi Mud," "My Ohio Home," and "Dream Kisses."
Appellants dispute liability on the ground that the contract with the orchestra made that organization an independent contractor, and, for its torts, it alone was liable. This contention has been made and rejected in numerous cases. The authorities are, we believe, unanimous in holding that the owner of a dance hall at whose place copyrighted musical composition are played in violation of the rights of the copyright holder is liable, if the playing be for the profit of the proprietor of the dance hall. And this is so even though the orchestra be employed under a contract that would ordinarily make it an independent...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McIntosh v. Northern California Universal Enterprises Company
...S.Ct. 2764; see, e.g., Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304, 308 (2nd Cir.1963); Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354, 355 (7th Cir.1929). "A defendant is vicariously liable for copyright infringement if he enjoys a direct financial benefit ......
-
Remick Music Corp. v. Interstate Hotel Co. of Nebraska
...Pastime Amusement Co. v. M. Witmark & Sons, 4 Cir., 2 F.2d 1020; Berlin Inc. v. Daigle, 5 Cir., 31 F.2d 832; Dreamland Ball Room v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 7 Cir., 36 F.2d 354; Buck v. Russo, D.C.Mass., 25 F.Supp. 317; Buck v. Dacier, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 37; Buck v. Savoia Restaurant, Inc., ......
-
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa Intern. Service Ass'n
...at 262 (citing Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co., 283 U.S. 191, 51 S.Ct. 410, 75 L.Ed. 971 (1931), and Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1929)).10 These cases show that courts are able to forestall the majority's parade of horribles. But our case d......
-
Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc
...Co., 432 F.Supp. 72 (W.D.Mo.1977) (cocktail lounge hired musicians to supply music to paying customers); Dreamland Ball Room v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354 (CA7 1929) (dance hall hired orchestra to supply music to paying customers) are often contrasted with the so-called landlord-......
-
Barak Y. Orbach, Indirect Free Riding on the Wheels of Commerce: Dual-use Technologies and Copyright Liability
...Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 351 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (W.D. Wash. 2004). 44 See, e.g., Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1929). 45 See, e.g., Herbert v. Shanley Co., 242 U.S. 591 (1916); KECA Music, Inc. v. Dingus McGee's Co., 432 F. Supp. 72 (W.D. Mo. 1......
-
I want my MP3: secondary copyright liability in a hidden peer-to-peer network.
...liability where cocktail lounge hired musicians to supply music to paying customers); Dreamland Ball Room v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1929) (upholding liability where dance hall hired orchestra to supply music to paying (55.) Compare Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, I......
-
The online copyright auction: how high will the bidding go?
...(relying on Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co., 283 U.S. 191, 198-199 (1931); Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354, 355 (7th Cir. 1929) (finding dance hall owner liable for performance of copyrighted music played); M. Witmark & Sons v. Tremont Social &am......
-
Paying for cable in Boston, watching it on a laptop in L.A.: does Slingbox violate federal copyright laws?
...hall scenario as "canonical illustration" of vicarious copyright infringement); Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354, 355 (7th Cir. 1929) (upholding vicarious infringement award against dance hall despite direct infringer being independent (47.) Aimster, 33......