Dube v. Peck
Decision Date | 27 February 1901 |
Parties | DUBE v. PECK, Town Treasurer. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Action for damages by Israel Dube against George H. Peck, town treasurer of the town of Bristol. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant petitions for a new trial. Remanded, with direction to enter judgment for defendant.
Henry W. Hayes, for plaintiff.
Orrin L, Bosworth. for defendant.
It is not disputed that on the 10th day of August, A. D. 1895, the plaintiff executed the following contract with the town of Bristol:
James C. Church.
"W. Howard walker, to I. D. Israel Dube."
That on August 13, 1895, the building committee located the site of the school house at about the middle of the north end of the common, and the plaintiff on the same day began work there, erecting some sheds for his material, and staking out the cellar for the school house. That on the same day he was notified to cease his work by the town sergeant, acting under the orders of the town council, and that in pursuance of such notice he at once ceased operations. That the site of the school house was finally located by the school committee of the town on the northwest corner of the common, and that on September 19, 1895, this location was ready for the plaintiff to work upon, and that he at once began work thereon, and finished the building on September 16, 1896. This building was duly accepted by the proper authorities, and the money due under this contract,—18,300,—together with some allow ances for extra work, was duly paid to the plaintiff, the following receipt being given by him at the time of the last payment, viz.: On November 1, 1898, the plaintiff brought his action against the town in the common pleas division of the supreme court for the county of Bristol, and recovered a verdict against the town for the sum of $4,125, upon a declaration of which the only count requiring consideration is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Ft. Scott, Kan., v. W.G. Eads Brokerage Co.
...v. City of Sheboygan (Wis.) 58 N.W. 747; Mousseau v. Sioux City (Iowa) 84 N.W. 1027; Von Schmidt v. Widbur (Cal.) 38 P. 682; Dube v. Peck (R.I.) 48 A. 477, 479; Gaslight Coke Co. v. City of New Albany (Ind. Sup.) 59 N.E. 176, 178; James v. City of Seattle (Wash.) 62 P. 84, 79 Am.St.Rep. 957......
-
Arava v. Bebe
...and was restricted in the amount of recovery by the wages agreed upon. O'Connell v. King & Son, 26 R. I. 544, 59 A. 926; Dube v. Peck, 22 R. I. 467, 48 A 477. The exception is without In charging the jury, after briefly stating plaintiff's claim, the trial justice said the defendant claims ......
-
O'Connell v. E. C. King & Son
... ... Dube ... v. Peck, 22 R. I. 467, 48 Atl. 477. Moreover, no testimony was in fact offered by the plaintiff, and no ruling or suggestion of tie court ... ...
-
Murphy v. Duffy
...This was recognized by the superior court in its final decree. In support of his position the complainant cites the cases of Dube v. Peck, 22 R. I. 443, 48 Atl. 477, and Dube v. Dixon, 27 R. I. 114, 60 Atl. 834. Each of those cases relate to the building of a schoolhouse in Bristol. In neit......