Dugote v. State
| Decision Date | 04 September 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 81714-6. |
| Citation | 196 P.3d 130,164 Wash.2d 1014 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | Kent DUGOTE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent. |
ORDER
¶ 1Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens, and J.M. Johnson, considered this matter at its September 3, 2008, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3The Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review is granted.The Petition for Review is granted.
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander
Chief Justice
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Hickok–Knight v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc.
... ... 12 Furthermore, as WalMart correctly notes, our Supreme Court rejected this reasoning in State v. Jacobsen, 78 Wash.2d 491, 495, 477 P.2d 1 (1970). 13 Thus, HickokKnight's argument fails. B. Harmless Error 59 HickokKnight next argues that ... ...
-
In re M.J.W.
... ... Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Okanogan County v. State , 182 Wash.2d 519, 531, 342 P.3d 308 (2015). Here, the trial court allowed Patti to intervene by both means. However, the Miniums appear 5 to only ... ...
-
Trotzer v. Vig
... ... State v. Duvall, 86 Wash. App. 871, 875, 940 P.2d 671 (1997), review denied, 134 Wash.2d 1012, 954 P.2d 276 (1998); Finkelstein v. Sec. Prop., Inc., ... ...
-
Ducote v. Dshs.
...222 P.3d 785 ... 167 Wn.2d 697 ... Kent DUCOTE, Petitioner, ... STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, Respondent ... No. 81714-6 ... Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc ... Argued May 28, ... ...