Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 04-16688.
| Citation | 556 F.3d 919 |
| Decision Date | 13 February 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-16688.,No. 04-16720.,04-16688.,04-16720. |
| Parties | Betty DUKES; Patricia Surgeson; Cleo Page; Deborah Gunter; Karen Williamson; Christine Kwapnoski; Edith Arana, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Betty Dukes; Patricia Surgeson; Cleo Page; Deborah Gunter; Karen Williamson; Christine Kwapnoski; Edith Arana, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Wal-Mart, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Debra Gardner, Esquire, Jonathan Smith, Esquire, Baltimore, MD, Irma Dolores Herrera, Esquire, Equal Rights Advocates, City Name, CA, Jocelyn Dion Larkin, Brad Seligman, The Impact Fund, Berkeley, CA, Shauna I. Marshall, Esquire, Hastings College of the Law, Debra Smith, Equal Rights Advocates, Steven L. Stemerman, Esquire, Elizabeth Ann Lawrence, Esquire, Davis Cowell & Bowe, San Francisco, CA, Joseph Sellers, Christine E. Webber, Partner, Deborah J. Vagins, Esquire, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Washington, DC, Stephen Tinkler, Esquire, Tinker & Bennett, Merit Bennett, Esquire, Charles V. Firth, Esquire, Tinker & Firth, Santa Fe, NM, Sheila Thomas, Esquire, Equal Rights Advocates, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Nancy L. Abell, Esquire, Paul Grossman, Esquire, Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Gail E. Lees, Esquire, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Katherine Consuelo Huibonhoa, Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Mark Andrew Perry, Counsel, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Barbara A. Johnson, Esquire, Neal D. Mollen, Esquire, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jeffrey A. Berman, Esquire, Sidley Austin LLP, Joel E. Krischer, Esquire, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ann Elizabeth Reesman, Esquire, Rae T. Vann, General Counsel, Norris, Tysse, Lampley & Lakis, LLP, Evelyn L. Becker, Esquire, John H. Beisner, Esquire, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Richard Abbott Samp, Chief Counsel, Washington Legal Foundation, Raymond C. Fay, Esquire, Constantine Cannon LLP, Sandi Farrell, Esquire, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC, Daniel B. Kohrman, Esquire, American Association of Retired Persons, Michael Foreman, Esquire, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, Washington, DC, Terri L. Ross, Esquire, McDermott Will & Emery, New York, NY, Marissa M. Tirona, Esquire, National Employment Lawyers Assoc., Maureen K. Bogue, Esquire, Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, Bill Lann Lee, Esquire, Lewis Feinberg Lee Renaker &...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jackson v. Unocal Corp., No. 09CA0610.
...(modifying opinion to omit citations to cases disavowed by IPO that appeared in original opinion), reh'g en banc granted, 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir.2009). Several states also follow the approach of IPO and its progeny to resolve conflicting evidence that bears on the Rule 23 requirements. See, ......
-
Jackson v. Unocal Corporation, Court of Appeals No. 09CA0610 (Colo. App. 7/23/2009)
...2007) (modifying opinion to omit citations to cases disavowed by IPO that appeared in original opinion), reh'g en banc granted, 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2009). Several states also follow the approach of IPO and its progeny to resolve conflicting evidence that bears on the Rule 23 requirements......
-
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Allen
...474 F.3d 1214, which held that full Daubert examination should not be conducted at class certification stage), reh'g granted, 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir.2009); In re Initial Public Offering Sec. Litig., 471 F.3d 24, 42 (2d Cir. 2006) (disavowing suggestion that expert's testimony may establish c......
-
Wal-Mart v. Dukes Redux: The Future Of The Sprawling Class Action
...v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2007); Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 509 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2007). See Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 556 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2009); Dukes, supra note SeeWal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S.Ct. 795 (2010). See also Petition for a Writ of Certiorari at i, Wa......