Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of America, et al.

Docket Number10-2316
Decision Date12 March 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
489 cases
  • Al Shimari v. CACI Premier Tech., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • March 22, 2019
    ...Civ. P. 56(a). Although the Court must view the record "in the light most favorable to the non-moving party," Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of Am., 673 F.3d 323, 324 (4th Cir. 2012), "[t]he mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the [nonmovant's] position will be insufficient"......
  • Santos v. Frederick Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • September 27, 2018
    ...for the nonmoving party.’ " Libertarian Party of Va. v. Judd , 718 F.3d 308, 313 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of Am. , 673 F.3d 323, 330 (4th Cir. 2012) ). "A fact is material if it ‘might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.’ " Id. (quoting Anderso......
  • United States v. 3 Knife-Shaped Coins
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • March 31, 2017
    ...for the nonmoving party.’ " Libertarian Party of Va. v. Judd , 718 F.3d 308, 313 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of Am. , 673 F.3d 323, 330 (4th Cir. 2012) ). "A fact is material if it ‘might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.’ " Id. (quoting Anderso......
  • Dao v. Faustin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • August 29, 2019
    ...of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to avoid harm otherwise.’ " Dulaney v. Packaging Corp. of Am. , 673 F.3d 323, 328 (4th Cir. 2012) (quoting Ellerth , 524 U.S. at 765, 118 S.Ct. 2257 ). Defendant Infused argues that plaintiffs' factual allegations dem......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • VOLUME II Chapter 22 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
    • United States
    • South Carolina Bar Labor and Employment Law for South Carolina Lawyers, Volumes I and II (SCBar)
    • Invalid date
    ...L. Ed. 2d 662 (1998).[454] Id. at 807.[455] 118 S. Ct. 2257 (1998).[456] 524 U.S. 775 at 807.[457] See, e.g., Dulaney v. Packaging Corp., 673 F.3d 323, 325 (4th Cir. 2012).[458] 159 F.3d 177 (4th Cir. 1998).[459] Id. at 181.[460] See, e.g., Jackson v. Morningside Assisted Living, 2006 U.S. ......
  • 1.4 Sexual Harassment
    • United States
    • Virginia CLE Employment Law in Virginia (Virginia CLE) Chapter 1 Title VII and the Reconstruction Era Statutes
    • Invalid date
    ...Ellerth, 524 U.S. at 761).[345] Id.[346] 183 F.3d 323 (4th Cir. 1999).[347] 184 F.3d 388 (4th Cir. 1999).[348] Id. at 395.[349] Id.[350] 673 F.3d 323, 332-33 (4th Cir. 2012).[351] Id. at 332.[352] 159 F.3d 177 (4th Cir. 1998).[353] Id. at 182 (citations omitted).[354] 21 F. Supp. 2d 560 (E.......