Duncan v. The Gov. Francis T. Nicholls
Decision Date | 18 October 1890 |
Citation | 44 F. 302 |
Parties | DUNCAN v. THE GOV. FRANCIS T. NICHOLLS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana |
The following are the findings of the district court referred to in the opinion:
T. M. Gill, for claimant.
H. Delesdernier, for libelant.
The case presented to this court, growing out of the collision of the tug Nicholls and the libelant's lugger, presents only questions of fact. The correct decision of these questions of fact depends upon the credibility to be given the witnesses on both sides. The important fact in the case is whether the libelant's lugger unnecessarily and improperly changed its course when in front of the defendant tug. After a careful and painstaking examination of the whole case, comparing and weighing the evidence given, I am unable to reach an opinion contrary to the findings of the district judge, and therefore affirm the decree given by the district court. In cases involving only facts, and the proof of these facts resting upon conflicting evidence and the credibility of witnesses, where there is no preponderance of evidence, nor additional evidence offered on appeal, the circuit courts in admiralty do not on appeal disturb the decrees of the district court. For both reason and authority, see The Thomas Melville, 37 F. 271, 36 F. 708; The Saratoga, 40 F. 509. The following decree will be entered in this case: This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of appeal, and was argued. On consideration whereof it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the libelant, H. Duncan, do have and recover from James Sweeney, owner of the tug-boat Gov. Francis T. Nicholls, claimant in this cause, and from Charles A. Miltenberger, surety of said Sweeney on the bond of release in solido, the sum of $150 damages, with 5 per cent. interest from judicial demand, to-wit, from March 9, 1889, until paid; and all costs of the district and circuit courts.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Sappho
...court will more readily examine the same, and reach its own conclusions thereon. The Glendale, 26 C.C.A. 500, 81 F. 633, 635; Duncan v. Nicholls, 44 F. 302; The Holberg, 43 F. 120; The Thomas Melville, 37 F. 271. But we do not regard this as a case depending upon conflicting evidence, or th......
-
The Captain Weber
... ... 565; The ... Warrior, 4 C.C.A. 498, 54 F. 534; Duncan v. The Gov ... Francis T. Nicholls, 44 F. 302; Taylor v. Harwood, ... ...
-
The Express, 38
...of the witnesses who were examined in his presence. Cooper v. The Saratoga, 40 F. 509; The Thomas Melville, 37 F. 271; The Francis T. Nicholls, 44 F. 302. Accepting conclusions of fact as correct, the Express must be acquitted of any fault contributing to the collision. If she was culpable ......
-
The Glendale
... ... The Thomas Melville, 37 F. 271; The ... Holberg, 43 F. 120; Duncan v. The Gov. Nicholls, 44 ... The ... rule and the reason of the ... ...