Duncan v. Yocum
Decision Date | 10 November 2021 |
Docket Number | Court of Appeals Case No. 20A-GU-2299 |
Parties | Lydia A. DUNCAN and Donald E. Frederick, Appellants-Petitioners, v. John J. YOCUM, Jr., Appellee-Respondent. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Attorneys for Appellants: Jeffrey B. Kolb, Charles E. Traylor, Kolb Roellgen & Traylor, LLP, Vincennes, Indiana
Attorneys for Appellee: Maurice E. Doll, Aaron D. Doll, Doll & Sievers Attorney at Law LLC, Vincennes, Indiana
[1] Lydia A. Duncan and Donald E. Frederick ("the Appellants") appeal the Gibson Circuit Court's order dismissing their petition to establish guardianship over John Yocum, Jr. ("John") and awarding attorney fees. The Appellants raise three issues on appeal, which we restate as:
[2] Concluding that the guardianship petition was properly dismissed, but the trial court erred when it awarded attorney fees to John, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
[3] John was a ninety-five-year old man who lived alone in a single family residence in Vincennes, Indiana. John had no known relatives. He lived in the same home for almost ninety years. John had trouble hearing and had poor eyesight. He also had moderate dementia. But John took care of his daily needs and his house was well-maintained.
[4] In August 2018, John was injured when he fell in his home. He was unable to get up and was not found for two to three days. John was hospitalized for several days. Lydia Duncan ("Lydia"), a family friend, agreed to live with and care for John in his home when he was released from the hospital and inpatient rehabilitation. But her agreement was conditioned on John granting Lydia his power of attorney. On September 5, 2018, John executed a power of attorney, naming Lydia as his attorney-in-fact and his neighbor David Lancaster ("David") as his successor attorney-in-fact. Lydia provided twenty-four hour care for John for approximately six weeks.
[5] In October 2018, John drafted a new will and a new power of attorney. He retained Lydia as his attorney-in-fact and as his health care representative, but he named his friend Donald Fredrick ("Donald") as his successor attorney-in-fact and successor health care representative. Lydia and Donald also agreed to serve as trustees of John's charitable trust.
[6] John was a frugal man and had accumulated significant assets. John managed his own investments. Under the 2018 Will, John transferred the bulk of his estate to the Charitable Trust upon his death. But John also established an educational trust for Lydia's daughter, who was also his goddaughter, willed his house to Lydia, and made several small bequests to other individuals in his neighborhood.
[7] While Lydia had authority to act as John's attorney-in-fact, she liquidated two of John's CDs in the amount of $250,000. She deposited $100,000 of the proceedings into a new checking account and listed herself and John as co-owners of the account.
[8] Lydia continued to assist John through December 2019. Lydia took John to appointments, cooked for him on occasion, and ran errands for him. On December 3, 2019, Lydia agreed to take John to an eye doctor appointment, but when she arrived at his home, John told her that the doctor had canceled the appointment. Lydia called the doctor's office and was told that John had canceled the appointment. An argument ensued after Lydia accused John of lying to her.
[9] The next day, Lydia returned to John's home and the argument continued. She began to look through John's personal documents that were laid out on his dining room table. John told her to stop looking at his documents several times. When she refused, John took ahold of Lydia's shoulder and pushed her away from the table. Lydia fell to the floor and accused John of kicking her. Lydia reported the incident to the police but no criminal charges were filed. Unbeknownst to John, Lydia recorded the incident. She also recorded John on several other occasions without his knowledge.
[10] On December 8, 2019, John revoked Lydia's power as attorney-in-fact and named his neighbor David as his attorney-in-fact. In February 2020, John executed a new will leaving his estate to his church.
[11] On December 20, 2019, Lydia and Donald filed a verified petition for appointment of guardian over John in Knox Circuit Court. In support of their petition, the Appellants attached as "Exhibit A" a letter from John's physician opining that John required 24-hour care. Appellants’ Conf. App. Vol II, p. 35. But the letter was dated December 10, 2018, over a year before the Appellants filed the petition for guardianship in this case.
[12] In Count II, Lydia and Donald requested a declaratory judgment determining that the power of attorney John had granted to David was void and unenforceable because John lacked the requisite capacity to execute the power of attorney. Lydia and Donald later amended their petition to include Count III, a request to declare John's 2020 will invalid due to fraud, duress, or undue influence. Lydia and Donald also requested an order compelling John to appear for a Trial Rule 35 examination.
[13] John objected to the Appellants’ petition and declaratory action and their request to have him examined pursuant to Trial Rule 35. John challenged the Appellants’ allegations that he was incapacitated and needed a guardian, but he also responded that, if he did need a guardian, he would not want either Lydia or Donald to serve in that capacity because he does not trust them. Id. at 82–83. John also objected to the Appellants’ claim that he lacked the requisite capacity to revoke his prior power of attorney.
[14] The proceedings were delayed for several reasons including discovery disputes and two changes of judge. The case was eventually transferred to Gibson Circuit Court. Before the trial court issued a ruling on the Appellants’ request for a Trial Rule 35 examination, the Appellants selected Dr. Tracy Gunter to examine John, paid her retainer fee, and scheduled an appointment. John continued to object to the need for a Trial Rule 35 examination. In May 2020, the trial court issued an order compelling John to appear for examination with Dr. Gunter, and John was examined on May 7, 2020. Dr. Gunter concluded that John was incapacitated.
[15] A bench trial commenced on September 1, 2020. On September 29, 2020, the trial court issued the following pertinent findings of fact and conclusions thereon:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stalions v. Stalions (In re Stalions)
...Wilcox Mfg. Group, Inc. v. Mktg. Servs. of Ind., Inc. , 832 N.E.2d 559, 562, 563 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) ; see also Duncan v. Yocum , 179 N.E.3d 988, 1002 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021) (holding that Appellants failed to establish that ninety-five-year-old man lacked the contractual capacity necessary t......
-
Stalions v. Stalions (In re Stalions)
...capacity and contractual capacity. See, e.g., In re Rhoades, 993 N.E.2d 291, 299 (Ind.Ct.App. 2013) (testamentary capacity); Duncan, 179 N.E.3d at 1002 (contractual capacity). The court's determination only that the court was required to weigh Coffey's testimony together with all the other ......