Dunlap v. Clay

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtCOOPER, C. J.
CitationDunlap v. Clay, 65 Miss. 454, 4 So. 118 (Miss. 1888)
Decision Date16 April 1888
PartiesVIRGINIA V. DUNLAP, EXECUTRIX, v. A. Q. CLAY

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Nenton County, HON. A. G. MAYERS Judge.

Virginia V. Dunlap, executrix of the last will and testament of D. R Dunlap, deceased, sued out an attachment against A. Q. Clay. The defendant moved to dismiss the attachment "for want of affidavit." The paper which purported to be the affidavit upon which the attachment was based was in the usual form, except that it was not subscribed by the affiant mentioned therein, and the jurat thereto was not signed by the justice of the peace before whom the affidavit was made as therein stated. The testimony of the justice of the peace and of J. V. Knight, who was mentioned in the affidavit as the affiant therein, (and there was no other testimony concerning the affidavit) showed that the affidavit was read to Knight, agent of the plaintiff in attachment, in the presence of the justice of the peace, then handed to the latter, who said to Knight will you swear to this paper, and Knight answered that he would, "but did not hold up his hand and swear." The evidence of both these witnesses was to the effect that they thought everything was done that was necessary to make the oath binding; and that by mistake the attachment bond only, and not the affidavit was signed by Knight, both being printed on the same sheet of paper, though the agent thought he had signed the affidavit. The justice of the peace failed to sign the jurat to the affidavit because of the same mistake.

The court rendered a judgment sustaining the defendant's motion and dismissing the attachment proceedings. Thereupon the plaintiff appealed to this court.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

S. B Watts, for the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Co. v. Keller
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 26, 1909
    ...jurisdiction. 168 Mo. 652-6; 33 Cal. 212; 36 Cal. 281; 45 Cal. 90; 6 Blackf. 125; 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 966; 6 Neb. 423; 65 Tex. 301; 65 Miss. 454; 105 785; 74 Id. 981; 81 Id. 78; 112 Id. 826; 142 Id. 187; 152 F. 293; 157 F. 847; 165 Id. 1; 95 Iowa 113; 41 Neb. 375. 2. The Hepburn act is unco......
  • Pyke v. City of Jamestown
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 15, 1906
    ... ... This was ... sufficient. An inquiry on the particular method pursued to ... accomplish this result was not material. Dunlap v ... Clay, 65 Miss. 454, 4 So. 118 ...          Error ... is also assigned upon the court's action in sustaining ... the objection ... ...
  • State v. Tull
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 24, 1933
    ...N.E. 568, 56 A. L. R. 403; United States v. Millard, 40 F. 151, 5 L. R. A. 816; McCain v. Bonner, 122 Ga. 842, 51 S.E. 36; Dunlap v. Clay, 65 Miss. 454, 4 So. 118; v. Holladay, 120 S.C. 154, 112 S.E. 827; Markey v. State, 47 Fla. 38, 59, 37 So. 53. See, also, for collation of cases, note to......
  • Markey v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1904
    ... ... hand, or doing any religious act.' United States v ... Mallard (D. C.) 40 F. 151, 5 L. R. A. 816; Dunlap v ... Clay, 65 Miss. 454, 4 So. 118; O'Reilley v. People, ... While ... there is force in the argument that the defendant, having ... ...
  • Get Started for Free