Dunlap v. Commonwealth
| Docket Number | 2010-SC-000226-MR |
| Decision Date | 20 February 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
60 cases
-
St. Clair v. Commonwealth
...must be punished by death. To the contrary, ‘a jury can reject a death sentence for any (or no) reason at all.’ ” Dunlap v. Commonwealth, 435 S.W.3d 537, 618 (Ky.2013) (quoting Ordway v. Commonwealth, 391 S.W.3d 762, 786 (Ky.2013) ).St. Clair's claim that sentencing disparity violated equal......
-
State v. Kleypas
...N.E.2d 454, 458 (Ind. 2005) (Supreme Court has not held that mentally ill persons are not subject to the death penalty); Dunlap v. Com. , 435 S.W.3d 537, 616 (Ky. 2013) (“We are not prepared to hold that mentally ill persons are categorically ineligible for the death penalty.”), cert. denie......
-
Futrell v. Commonwealth, 2013–SC–000184–MR
...to be removed for cause.Because the trial court did not allow the parties any extra, error-correcting peremptories, seeDunlap v. Commonwealth,435 S.W.3d 537 (Ky. 2013)(approving the use of extra peremptories as a way of rendering harmless that same number of erroneous failures to remove for......
-
Sneed v. Burress
...to only when there appears in the record a manifest necessity for such an action or an urgent or real necessity.” Dunlap v. Commonwealth, 435 S.W.3d 537, 604 (Ky.2013), as modified (Feb. 20, 2014).5 We have instructed the trial courts that their discretion to order a mistrial “is to be used......
Get Started for Free
